Literature DB >> 12930105

Prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery: the cost of ignoring the evidence.

Naureen Wasey1, James Baughan, C J de Gara.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Three strategies are used to prevent complications in colorectal surgery: heparin and antibiotics given perioperatively and abdominal drains placed intraoperatively. To investigate the appropriate and inappropriate use of these prophylactic techniques and to assess the costs associated with their inappropriate use, we studied patients who underwent elective colorectal procedures.
METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 103 patients operated on between April and December 1999 at a 519-bed tertiary care, teaching hospital in Edmonton, Alta. The procedures carried out were elective sigmoid resection, low anterior resection, left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy and total or subtotal colectomy for benign or malignant conditions. The data collected included patient age and sex, diagnosis, the operating surgeon, and the housestaff or surgeon writing the pre- and postoperative orders. Patients who required emergency colorectal surgery were excluded from the study. Antibiotic, heparin and drain prophylaxis was assessed and considered appropriate if prescribed according to the evidence or inappropriate if prescribed when not recommended.
RESULTS: Thirty-six of 98 patients had inappropriate heparin prophylaxis (5 of the 103 were excluded because they were already receiving heparin). Only 5 of 96 patients were treated appropriately with antibiotics preoperatively without postoperative doses (7 of the 103 were excluded due to intraoperative spillage with fecal contamination or an intra-abdominal abscess found intraoperatively); 95% of patients were inappropriately treated with antibiotics postoperatively. Half of all the patients had a drain inserted inappropriately for prophylaxis. On average, drains inserted inappropriately cost 30.40 dollars per patient, inappropriate antibiotic use cost 62.42 dollars per patient and inappropriate heparin use cost 89.30 dollars per patient. Preoperative orders were usually written by the staff surgeon, whereas postoperative orders were usually written by the resident or intern.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed considerable inappropriate use of heparin, antibiotic and drain prophylaxis. Considering the number of elective colorectal procedures performed annually, these inappropriately used strategies represent a substantial cost to the health care system. Improved education of surgeons and residents is needed to change to evidence-based practice habits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930105      PMCID: PMC3211642     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  19 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  W H Geerts; J A Heit; G P Clagett; G F Pineo; C W Colwell; F A Anderson; H B Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Bowel preparation for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  O Zmora; A J Pikarsky; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Single or multiple doses of metronidazole and ampicillin in elective colorectal surgery. A randomized trial.

Authors:  P Juul; K E Klaaborg; O Kronborg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  The detection of venous thrombosis of the legs using 125-I-labelled fibrinogen.

Authors:  C Flanc; V V Kakkar; M B Clarke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  G P Clagett; F A Anderson; J Heit; M N Levine; H B Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Effects of prophylactic antibiotics on wound infection after elective colon and rectal surgery: 1960 to 1980.

Authors:  S P Bartlett; R C Burton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A survey of clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery: evidence against further use of no-treatment controls.

Authors:  M L Baum; D S Anish; T C Chalmers; H S Sacks; H Smith; R M Fagerstrom
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Association for Surgical Research.

Authors:  F Merad; J M Hay; A Fingerhut; E Yahchouchi; Y Laborde; E Pélissier; S Msika; Y Flamant
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: adherence to the 1995 American College of Chest Physicians consensus guidelines for surgical patients.

Authors:  M A Stratton; F A Anderson; H I Bussey; J Caprini; A Comerota; S T Haines; D W Hawkins; M B O'Connell; R C Smith; K A Stringer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-02-14

10.  Oral versus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colon surgery: a randomized study and meta-analysis send a message from the 1990s.

Authors:  Ronald T Lewis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  10 in total

1.  Why do surgeons not comply with "best practice"?

Authors:  John M A Bohnen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Quality care is job one.

Authors:  Garth L Warnock
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Practice patterns for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in minimal-access surgery.

Authors:  Richard Beekman; Mark Crowther; Forough Farrokhyar; Daniel W Birch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Factors influencing antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infection prevention in general surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Darlene Fenech; Cagla Eskicioglu; Avery B Nathens; Robin McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not affect nodal harvest comparing elective procedures: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Gianluca Costa; Laura Lorenzon; Giulia Massa; Barbara Frezza; Mario Ferri; Pietro Fransvea; Paolo Mercantini; Maria Cristina Giustiniani; Genoveffa Balducci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Evidence-based surgical practice in academic medical centers: consistently anecdotal?

Authors:  Marcovalerio Melis; Richard C Karl; Sandra L Wong; Murray F Brennan; Jeffrey B Matthews; Kevin K Roggin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The influence of evidence in the surgical treatment of thumb basilar joint arthritis.

Authors:  Oluseyi Aliu; Matthew M Davis; Sonya DeMonner; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Critical issues in the clinical management of complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Stijn Blot; Jan J De Waele
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  The feasibility of short term prophylactic antibiotics in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jun Suh Lee; Han Hong Lee; Kyo Young Song; Cho Hyun Park; Hae Myung Jeon
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 10.  Perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy: results of a survey in 23 European participating centres of the DISPACT trial and a review of literature.

Authors:  Helge Bruns; Nuh N Rahbari; Thorsten Löffler; Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Christoph Schuhmacher; Inga Rossion; Markus W Büchler; Tido Junghans
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.