Literature DB >> 12929922

Training in cortical control of neuroprosthetic devices improves signal extraction from small neuronal ensembles.

S I Helms Tillery1, D M Taylor, A B Schwartz.   

Abstract

We have recently developed a closed-loop environment in which we can test the ability of primates to control the motion of a virtual device using ensembles of simultaneously recorded neurons /29/. Here we use a maximum likelihood method to assess the information about task performance contained in the neuronal ensemble. We trained two animals to control the motion of a computer cursor in three dimensions. Initially the animals controlled cursor motion using arm movements, but eventually they learned to drive the cursor directly from cortical activity. Using a population vector (PV) based upon the relation between cortical activity and arm motion, the animals were able to control the cursor directly from the brain in a closed-loop environment, but with difficulty. We added a supervised learning method that modified the parameters of the PV according to task performance (adaptive PV), and found that animals were able to exert much finer control over the cursor motion from brain signals. Here we describe a maximum likelihood method (ML) to assess the information about target contained in neuronal ensemble activity. Using this method, we compared the information about target contained in the ensemble during arm control, during brain control early in the adaptive PV, and during brain control after the adaptive PV had settled and the animal could drive the cursor reliably and with fine gradations. During the arm-control task, the ML was able to determine the target of the movement in as few as 10% of the trials, and as many as 75% of the trials, with an average of 65%. This average dropped when the animals used a population vector to control motion of the cursor. On average we could determine the target in around 35% of the trials. This low percentage was also reflected in poor control of the cursor, so that the animal was unable to reach the target in a large percentage of trials. Supervised adjustment of the population vector parameters produced new weighting coefficients and directional tuning parameters for many neurons. This produced a much better performance of the brain-controlled cursor motion. It was also reflected in the maximum likelihood measure of cell activity, producing the correct target based only on neuronal activity in over 80% of the trials on average. The changes in maximum likelihood estimates of target location based on ensemble firing show that an animal's ability to regulate the motion of a cortically controlled device is not crucially dependent on the experimenter's ability to estimate intention from neuronal activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12929922     DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.2003.14.1-2.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Neurosci        ISSN: 0334-1763            Impact factor:   4.353


  9 in total

Review 1.  Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy.

Authors:  Corey J Bohil; Bradly Alicea; Frank A Biocca
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Neural decoding of hand motion using a linear state-space model with hidden states.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Jayant E Kulkarni; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Liam Paninski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Real-time decoding of nonstationary neural activity in motor cortex.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Advantages of closed-loop calibration in intracortical brain-computer interfaces for people with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; Daniel Bacher; Sydney S Cash; Emad Eskandar; Gerhard Friehs; John P Donoghue; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array.

Authors:  J D Simeral; S-P Kim; M J Black; J P Donoghue; L R Hochberg
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 7.  Brain computer interface learning for systems based on electrocorticography and intracortical microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Shivayogi V Hiremath; Weidong Chen; Wei Wang; Stephen Foldes; Ying Yang; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Jennifer L Collinger; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-10

Review 8.  Data-Driven Transducer Design and Identification for Internally-Paced Motor Brain Computer Interfaces: A Review.

Authors:  Marie-Caroline Schaeffer; Tetiana Aksenova
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Augmenting intracortical brain-machine interface with neurally driven error detectors.

Authors:  Nir Even-Chen; Sergey D Stavisky; Jonathan C Kao; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.