Literature DB >> 12928022

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic measurement of left atrial appendage blood flow velocity: comparison with transoesophageal measurement.

N Fukuda1, H Shinohara, K Sakabe, Y Onose, T Nada, Y Tamura.   

Abstract

AIM: We validated transthoracic echocardiographic measurements of left atrial appendage flow velocity by comparing them with transoesophageal echocardiographic measurements. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Eighty-four consecutive patients (mean age, 64.6 years) with various cardiac diseases, who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography were studied. Thirty-two patients were in sinus rhythm, and the remaining 52 patients were in atrial fibrillation. On transthoracic echocardiography, the transducer was placed somewhat superior and outside from the position viewing the conventional parasternal short-axis image of the aortic valve, so that the angle between left atrial appendage midline and Doppler beam could be narrowed. The left atrial appendage flow velocity pattern was recorded by pulsed Doppler mode with a sampling volume placed at the left atrial appendage orifice on both transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography. In both approaches, the peak emptying velocity (LAA-E) and the peak filling velocity (LAA-F) of the left atrial appendage were measured. In sinus rhythm, the LAA-E was detectable in 25 of the 32 patients (78.1%) and the LAA-F in 20 of the 32 patients (62.5%). Both LAA-E and LAA-F were detectable in 46 of the 52 patients (88.5%) in atrial fibrillation. Good correlations of LAA-E and LAA-F were observed between transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography measurements in sinus rhythm (r=0.94, r=0.95, respectively; both, P<0.0001) and in atrial fibrillation (r=0.89, r=0.95, respectively; both, P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The left atrial appendage flow velocities could be sufficiently recorded and assessed by transthoracic echocardiography in 84 Japanese unselected consecutive patients with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12928022     DOI: 10.1016/s1525-2167(02)00166-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr        ISSN: 1532-2114


  6 in total

1.  Clinical significance of anterior mitral leaflet fibrillation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: comparison with blood flow and wall motion of the left atrial appendage.

Authors:  Yamato Fukuda; Nobuo Fukuda; Koichi Sakabe; Satofumi Morishita; Hisanori Shinohara; Yoshiyuki Tamura
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-03-18

Review 2.  Left Atrial Appendage Function and Stroke Risk.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Christopher Song; William A Gray; Karen L Furie; Mitchell S V Elkind; Hooman Kamel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of the Left Atrial Appendage to Predict Thrombosis Risk.

Authors:  Giorgia Maria Bosi; Andrew Cook; Rajan Rai; Leon J Menezes; Silvia Schievano; Ryo Torii; Gaetano Burriesci
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-04

4.  The Role of Patient-Specific Morphological Features of the Left Atrial Appendage on the Thromboembolic Risk Under Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Giulio Musotto; Alessandra Monteleone; Danila Vella; Sofia Di Leonardo; Alessia Viola; Giuseppe Pitarresi; Bernardo Zuccarello; Antonio Pantano; Andrew Cook; Giorgia M Bosi; Gaetano Burriesci
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 5.  Left atrial volumes and associated stroke subtypes.

Authors:  Quratulain Shaikh; Bilal Ahmed; Maryam Ahmed; Jamal Hussain Mahar; Masood Ahmad; Ayesha Ahmed; Farzin Majeed; Fariha Sadiq Ali; Maria Khan; Ayeesha Kamran Kamal
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Numerical Simulation of the Influence of Geometric Configurations on Pressure Difference in the Intraventricular Tunnel.

Authors:  Yao Yang; Junjie Wang; Aike Qiao; Xiangming Fan
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.