| Literature DB >> 35911543 |
Giulio Musotto1,2, Alessandra Monteleone1, Danila Vella1, Sofia Di Leonardo1, Alessia Viola1,2, Giuseppe Pitarresi2, Bernardo Zuccarello2, Antonio Pantano2, Andrew Cook3, Giorgia M Bosi4, Gaetano Burriesci1,4.
Abstract
Background: A large majority of thrombi causing ischemic complications under atrial fibrillation (AF) originate in the left atrial appendage (LAA), an anatomical structure departing from the left atrium, characterized by a large morphological variability between individuals. This work analyses the hemodynamics simulated for different patient-specific models of LAA by means of computational fluid-structure interaction studies, modeling the effect of the changes in contractility and shape resulting from AF.Entities:
Keywords: LAA morphology; atrial fibrillation (AF); fluid–structure interaction; left atrial appendage; patient-specific models
Year: 2022 PMID: 35911543 PMCID: PMC9329814 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.894187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
FIGURE 1(A) Description of the selection method adopted for the LAA study region; (B) schematic procedure used to generate the inner and outer LAA walls, starting from the external blood surface; and (C) example of mesh for both the solid and fluid domains with the selected size.
FIGURE 2Left atrial appendage CAD models obtained for the four different patient specific shapes, seen from two views.
FIGURE 3Cross-section of the chicken wing model at the maximum expansion (left) and at the maximum contraction (right).
FIGURE 4Thermal load (continuous line) and physiological atrial pressure curve (dashed line).
Percentage volume change simulated for all models and all operating conditions.
| Sinus rhythm | AF acute | AF chronic | |
| Chicken wing | 56.15% | 3.24% | 3.30% |
| Cactus | 57.86% | 4.10% | 4.46% |
| Windsock | 57.43% | 2.50% | 2.77% |
| Cauliflower | 74.12% | 3.84% | 3.85% |
FIGURE 5Average wall SSR estimated for all models in sinus rhythm (top), acute AF (middle), and chronic AF (bottom) conditions.
FIGURE 6Color maps of the maximum wall SSR at the instant of the cycle when they reach the maximum value, estimated for all models and all operating conditions.
FIGURE 7Risk area maps in (A) sinus rhythm, (B) AF acute, and (C) AF chronic.
Percentage of LAA area exposed to SSR values below 10 and 5 s1 for the entire cycle for the different operating conditions and all models.
| Sinus rhythm | AF acute | AF chronic | ||||
| <5 s–1 | <10 s–1 | <5 s–1 | <10 s–1 | <5 s–1 | <10 s–1 | |
| Chicken Wing | 3% | 17% | 64% | 93% | 52% | 76% |
| Cactus | 3% | 11% | 55% | 93% | 33% | 63% |
| Windsock | 4% | 17% | 86% | 100% | 60% | 96% |
| Cauliflower | 0 | 3% | 64% | 95% | 46% | 79% |
Maximum velocity in sinus rhythm, AF acute, and AF chronic [cm/s].
| Sinus rhythm | AF acute | AF chronic | |
| Chicken Wing | 15 | 2.5 | 4.6 |
| Cactus | 10 | 2.8 | 4.4 |
| Windsock | 15 | 2.2 | 3.5 |
| Cauliflower | 20 | 1.9 | 4.7 |