Literature DB >> 12923640

Effect of electromyostimulation training on soleus and gastrocnemii H- and T-reflex properties.

Nicola A Maffiuletti1, Manuela Pensini, Gil Scaglioni, Alessandra Ferri, Yves Ballay, Alain Martin.   

Abstract

When muscle is artificially activated, as with electromyostimulation (EMS), action potentials are evoked in both intramuscular nerve branches and cutaneous receptors, therefore activating spinal motoneurons reflexively. Maximal soleus and gastrocnemii H- and T-reflex and the respective mechanical output were thus quantified to examine possible neural adaptations induced at the spinal level by EMS resistance training. Eight subjects completed 16 sessions of isometric EMS (75 Hz) over a 4-week period. Maximal soleus and gastrocnemii M wave (M(max)), H reflex (H(max)) and T reflex (T(max)) were compared between before and after training, together with the corresponding plantar flexor peak twitch torque. No significant changes were observed for electromechanical properties of H(max) reflex following EMS. On the other hand, peak twitch torque produced by T(max), but not by equal-amplitude H reflex, significantly increased as a result of training (+21%, P<0.05). These changes were associated with a trend towards a significant increase for normalized gastrocnemii (+21%, P=0.07) but not soleus T(max) reflex. It is concluded that, contrary to results previously obtained after voluntary physical training, EMS training of the plantar flexor muscles did not affect alpha motoneuron excitability and/or presynaptic inhibition, as indicated by H-reflex results. On the other hand, in the absence of change in a control group, T(max) electromechanical findings indicated that: (1). equal-amplitude H- and T-reflex adapted differently to EMS resistance training; and (2). EMS had an effect on gastrocnemii but not on soleus muscle, perhaps because of the differences in respective motor unit characteristics (e.g., axon diameter).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12923640     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0914-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  30 in total

1.  Re-examination of training effects by electrostimulation in the human elbow musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  S Colson; A Martin; J Van Hoecke
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Activation of human plantar flexor muscles increases after electromyostimulation training.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Manuela Pensini; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-04

3.  Effects of isometric training on the elasticity of human tendon structures in vivo.

Authors:  K Kubo; H Kanehisa; M Ito; T Fukunaga
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-07

4.  Effects of electrically induced fatigue on the twitch and tetanus of paralyzed soleus muscle in humans.

Authors:  R K Shields; L F Law; B Reiling; K Sass; J Wilwert
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1997-05

5.  Human plantar flexion strength and structure.

Authors:  A R Fugl-Meyer; M Sjöström; L Wählby
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1979-09

6.  Comparison of Electro-Myo Stimulation to lsokinetic Training in Increasing -Power of the Knee Extensor Mechanism *.

Authors:  J Halback; D Straus
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 7.  Muscle strength and its development. New perspectives.

Authors:  R M Enoka
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Contraction times of twitches evoked by H-reflexes.

Authors:  F Buchthal; H Schmalbruch
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1970-11

9.  Mechanically and electrically elicited monosynaptic reflexes in man.

Authors:  M M Gassel; E Diamantopoulos
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.531

10.  Influence of long-term spaceflight on neuromechanical properties of muscles in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Lambertz; Francis Goubel; Rustem Kaspranski; Chantal Pérot
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-09-20
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Late neural adaptations to electrostimulation resistance training of the plantar flexor muscles.

Authors:  Marc Jubeau; Raphaël Zory; Julien Gondin; Alain Martin; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Chronic low-frequency rTMS of primary motor cortex diminishes exercise training-induced gains in maximal voluntary force in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Mikhael Lomarev; Ejaz Shamim; Sabine Meunier; Heike Russman; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-11-13

4.  Electrostimulation improves muscle perfusion but does not affect either muscle deoxygenation or pulmonary oxygen consumption kinetics during a heavy constant-load exercise.

Authors:  Gwenael Layec; Grégoire P Millet; Aurélie Jougla; Jean-Paul Micallef; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Neural adaptations to electrical stimulation strength training.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Using the Hephaistos orthotic device to study countermeasure effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and dietary lupin protein supplementation, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jochen Zange; Kathrin Schopen; Kirsten Albracht; Darius A Gerlach; Petra Frings-Meuthen; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Wilhelm Bloch; Jörn Rittweger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Insights into the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and motor imagery in a training-based approach.

Authors:  Amandine Bouguetoch; Alain Martin; Sidney Grosprêtre
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.