Literature DB >> 19008488

Chronic low-frequency rTMS of primary motor cortex diminishes exercise training-induced gains in maximal voluntary force in humans.

Tibor Hortobágyi1, Sarah Pirio Richardson, Mikhael Lomarev, Ejaz Shamim, Sabine Meunier, Heike Russman, Nguyet Dang, Mark Hallett.   

Abstract

Although there is consensus that the central nervous system mediates the increases in maximal voluntary force (maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) produced by resistance exercise, the involvement of the primary motor cortex (M1) in these processes remains controversial. We hypothesized that 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 during resistance training would diminish strength gains. Forty subjects were divided equally into five groups. Subjects voluntarily (Vol) abducted the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) (5 bouts x 10 repetitions, 10 sessions, 4 wk) at 70-80% MVC. Another group also exercised but in the 1-min-long interbout rest intervals they received rTMS [Vol+rTMS, 1 Hz, FDI motor area, 300 pulses/session, 120% of the resting motor threshold (rMT)]. The third group also exercised and received sham rTMS (Vol+Sham). The fourth group received only rTMS (rTMS_only). The 37.5% and 33.3% gains in MVC in Vol and Vol+Sham groups, respectively, were greater (P = 0.001) than the 18.9% gain in Vol+rTMS, 1.9% in rTMS_only, and 2.6% in unexercised control subjects who received no stimulation. Acutely, within sessions 5 and 10, single-pulse TMS revealed that motor-evoked potential size and recruitment curve slopes were reduced in Vol+rTMS and rTMS_only groups and accumulated to chronic reductions by session 10. There were no changes in rMT, maximum compound action potential amplitude (M(max)), and peripherally evoked twitch forces in the trained FDI and the untrained abductor digiti minimi. Although contributions from spinal sources cannot be excluded, the data suggest that M1 may play a role in mediating neural adaptations to strength training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19008488      PMCID: PMC2644240          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90701.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  59 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T J Carroll; S Riek; R G Carson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses?

Authors:  T Touge; W Gerschlager; P Brown; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Jose Rafael Romero; David Anschel; Roland Sparing; Massimo Gangitano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Wolf Muellbacher; Ulf Ziemann; Joerg Wissel; Nguyet Dang; Markus Kofler; Stefano Facchini; Babak Boroojerdi; Werner Poewe; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Modulation of intracortical inhibition induced by low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  B Fierro; A Piazza; F Brighina; V La Bua; D Buffa; M Oliveri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Long lasting effects of rTMS and associated peripheral sensory input on MEPs, SEPs and transcortical reflex excitability in humans.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tsuji; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization.

Authors:  M S Remple; R M Bruneau; P M VandenBerg; C Goertzen; J A Kleim
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue.

Authors:  S C Gandevia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  Depression of human corticospinal excitability induced by magnetic theta-burst stimulation: evidence of rapid polarity-reversing metaplasticity.

Authors:  Reinhard Gentner; Katharina Wankerl; Claus Reinsberger; Daniel Zeller; Joseph Classen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Corticospinal and spinal adaptations to motor skill and resistance training: Potential mechanisms and implications for motor rehabilitation and athletic development.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Alex Woodhead; Ashlyn K Frazer; Jessica Hill; Dawson J Kidgell; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Interhemispheric plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Mikhael Lomarev; Ejaz Shamim; Sabine Meunier; Heike Russman; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Tracking the corticospinal responses to strength training.

Authors:  Joel Mason; Ashlyn K Frazer; Janne Avela; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Neural adaptations to electrical stimulation strength training.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Intermittent Theta Burst Over M1 May Increase Peak Power of a Wingate Anaerobic Test and Prevent the Reduction of Voluntary Activation Measured with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Louis-Solal Giboin; Patrick Thumm; Raphael Bertschinger; Markus Gruber
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation attenuates the perception of force output production in non-exercised hand muscles after unilateral exercise.

Authors:  Stuart Goodall; Alan St Clair Gibson; Bernhard Voller; Mike Lomarev; Glyn Howatson; Nguyet Dang; Tibor Hortobágyi; Mark Hallett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on recovery in lower limb muscle strength and gait function following spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Søren Krogh; Per Aagaard; Anette Bach Jønsson; Krystian Figlewski; Helge Kasch
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.772

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.