Literature DB >> 12919738

Packaging of human endogenous retrovirus sequences is undetectable in porcine endogenous retrovirus particles produced from human cells.

Kristen Suling1, Gary Quinn, James Wood, Clive Patience.   

Abstract

The chronic shortage of human donor organs and tissues for allotransplantation could be relieved if clinical xenotransplantation were to become a viable clinical therapy. Balanced against the benefits of xenotransplantation are the possible consequences of zoonotic infections, and in particular, infection by porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV). An often-proclaimed risk of PERV infection is the possible recombination of PERV with human endogenous retroviruses (HERV). To address this issue, we examined the potential for HERV sequences to be cross-packaged into PERV particles produced from infected human 293 cells. Although HERV-K, W, E, R, and ERV-9 RNA transcripts are expressed in 293 cells, we did not detect cross-packaging of any of these HERV groups. Quantitative analysis indicated that less than approximately 1 in 10(4)-10(7) PERV particles might contain HERV sequences. In comparison, we found that murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based vector transcripts were cross-packaged at a rate of approximately one copy in 10(4) PERV particles. Our results indicate that the potential for recombination of PERV and HERV sequences is low and that novel viruses generated by this mechanism are unlikely to represent a significant risk for xenotransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12919738     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6822(03)00380-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virology        ISSN: 0042-6822            Impact factor:   3.616


  8 in total

1.  Identification of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) packaging sequence and development of PERV packaging viral vector system.

Authors:  Jiwon Choi; Hoon-mi Kim; Jong Kwang Yoon; Yeondong Cho; Hee-Jung Lee; Kang Chang Kim; Chang-Kyu Kim; Gye-Woong Kim; Young Bong Kim
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Evidence and consequence of porcine endogenous retrovirus recombination.

Authors:  Birke Bartosch; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Richard Myers; Robin Weiss; Clive Patience; Yasuhiro Takeuchi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Infection barriers to successful xenotransplantation focusing on porcine endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Joachim Denner; Ralf R Tönjes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Selective inhibition of porcine endogenous retrovirus replication in human cells by acyclic nucleoside phosphonates.

Authors:  Minyi Shi; Xin Wang; Erik De Clercq; Sonshin Takao; Masanori Baba
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Detection of a gammaretrovirus, XMRV, in the human population: open questions and implications for xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.602

Review 6.  PERVading strategies and infectious risk for clinical xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Christopher G A McGregor; Yasu Takeuchi; Linda Scobie; Guerard Byrne
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 7.  How Active Are Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERVs)?

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 8.  Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) - Molecular Structure and Replication Strategy in the Context of Retroviral Infection Risk of Human Cells.

Authors:  Krzysztof Łopata; Emilia Wojdas; Roman Nowak; Paweł Łopata; Urszula Mazurek
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.