Literature DB >> 15564496

Evidence and consequence of porcine endogenous retrovirus recombination.

Birke Bartosch1, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Richard Myers, Robin Weiss, Clive Patience, Yasuhiro Takeuchi.   

Abstract

The genetic nature and biological effects of recombination between porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) were studied. An infectious molecular clone was generated from a high-titer, human-tropic PERV isolate, PERV-A 14/220 (B. A. Oldmixon, et al. J. Virol. 76:3045-3048, 2002; T. A. Ericsson et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:6759-6764, 2003). To analyze this sequence and 15 available full-length PERV nucleotide sequences, we developed a sequence comparison program, LOHA(TM) to calculate local sequence homology between two sequences. This analysis determined that PERV-A 14/220 arose by homologous recombination of a PERV-C genome replacing an 850-bp region around the pol-env junction with that of a PERV-A sequence. This 850-bp PERV-A sequence encompasses the env receptor binding domain, thereby conferring a wide host range including human cells. In addition, we determined that multiple regions derived from PERV-C are responsible for the increased infectious titer of PERV-A 14/220. Thus, a single recombination event may be a fast and effective way to generate high-titer, potentially harmful PERV. Further, local homology and phylogenetic analyses between 16 full-length sequences revealed evidence for other recombination events in the past that give rise to other PERV genomes that possess the PERV-A, but not the PERV-B, env gene. These results indicate that PERV-A env is more prone to recombination with heterogeneous backbone genomes than PERV-B env. Such recombination events that generate more active PERV-A appear to occur in pigs rather frequently, which increases the potential risk of zoonotic PERV transmission. In this context, pigs lacking non-human-tropic PERV-C would be more suitable as donor animals for clinical xenotransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15564496      PMCID: PMC533951          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.24.13880-13890.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  50 in total

1.  The pathogenic potential of endogenous retroviruses: a sceptical view.

Authors:  J P Stoye
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 2.  Xenotransplantation: reappraising the risk of retroviral zoonosis.

Authors:  Y Takeuchi; R A Weiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.486

3.  Comparison of replication-competent molecular clones of porcine endogenous retrovirus class A and class B derived from pig and human cells.

Authors:  U Krach; N Fischer; F Czauderna; R R Tönjes
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  An envelope glycoprotein of the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-W is expressed in the human placenta and fuses cells expressing the type D mammalian retrovirus receptor.

Authors:  J L Blond; D Lavillette; V Cheynet; O Bouton; G Oriol; S Chapel-Fernandes; B Mandrand; F Mallet; F L Cosset
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  No evidence of infection with porcine endogenous retrovirus in recipients of encapsulated porcine islet xenografts.

Authors:  R B Elliott; L Escobar; O Garkavenko; M C Croxson; B A Schroeder; M McGregor; G Ferguson; N Beckman; S Ferguson
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Multiple groups of novel retroviral genomes in pigs and related species.

Authors:  C Patience; W M Switzer; Y Takeuchi; D J Griffiths; M E Goward; W Heneine; J P Stoye; R A Weiss
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Liver allotransplantation after extracorporeal hepatic support with transgenic (hCD55/hCD59) porcine livers: clinical results and lack of pig-to-human transmission of the porcine endogenous retrovirus.

Authors:  M F Levy; J Crippin; S Sutton; G Netto; J McCormack; T Curiel; R M Goldstein; J T Newman; T A Gonwa; J Banchereau; L E Diamond; G Byrne; J Logan; G B Klintmalm
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  No evidence for infection of human cells with porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) after exposure to porcine fetal neuronal cells.

Authors:  J H Dinsmore; C Manhart; R Raineri; D B Jacoby; A Moore
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Establishment and characterization of molecular clones of porcine endogenous retroviruses replicating on human cells.

Authors:  F Czauderna; N Fischer; K Boller; R Kurth; R R Tönjes
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Host range and interference studies of three classes of pig endogenous retrovirus.

Authors:  Y Takeuchi; C Patience; S Magre; R A Weiss; P T Banerjee; P Le Tissier; J P Stoye
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.103

View more
  33 in total

1.  Retroviral restriction factors and infectious risk in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Y Meije; R R Tönjes; J A Fishman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Determinants of high titer in recombinant porcine endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Ian Harrison; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Birke Bartosch; Jonathan P Stoye
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Fluidized-bed bioartificial liver assist devices (BLADs) based on microencapsulated primary porcine hepatocytes have risk of porcine endogenous retroviruses transmission.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Fei Liu; Xiao Ping Pan; Guoliang Lv; Anye Zhang; Chen Bo Yu; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Doubling genome size without polyploidization: dynamics of retrotransposition-driven genomic expansions in Oryza australiensis, a wild relative of rice.

Authors:  Benoit Piegu; Romain Guyot; Nathalie Picault; Anne Roulin; Abhijit Sanyal; Abhijit Saniyal; Hyeran Kim; Kristi Collura; Darshan S Brar; Scott Jackson; Rod A Wing; Olivier Panaud
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Mice transgenic for a human porcine endogenous retrovirus receptor are susceptible to productive viral infection.

Authors:  Y Martina; K T Marcucci; S Cherqui; A Szabo; T Drysdale; U Srinivisan; C A Wilson; C Patience; D R Salomon
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Porcine endogenous retroviruses PERV A and A/C recombinant are insensitive to a range of divergent mammalian TRIM5alpha proteins including human TRIM5alpha.

Authors:  Andrew Wood; Benjamin L J Webb; Birke Bartosch; Torsten Schaller; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Greg J Towers
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 7.  The human endogenous retrovirus link between genes and environment in multiple sclerosis and in multifactorial diseases associating neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Hervé Perron; Alois Lang
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  Identification of residues outside of the receptor binding domain that influence the infectivity and tropism of porcine endogenous retrovirus.

Authors:  Takele Argaw; Mariel Figueroa; Daniel R Salomon; Carolyn A Wilson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Susceptibility of porcine endogenous retrovirus to anti-retroviral inhibitors.

Authors:  Takele Argaw; Winston Colon-Moran; Carolyn Wilson
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.907

10.  Genome areas with high gene density and CpG island neighborhood strongly attract porcine endogenous retrovirus for integration and favor the formation of hot spots.

Authors:  Y Moalic; H Félix; Y Takeuchi; A Jestin; Y Blanchard
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.