Literature DB >> 12917274

Comparison of midwifery-led and consultant-led maternity care for low risk deliveries in Nepal.

T Geetha Rana1, Rashmi Rajopadhyaya, Binod Bajracharya, Manju Karmacharya, David Osrin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Nepal's first independent midwifery unit, the Patan Hospital Birthing Centre (BC), as a model for training and service provision for low risk deliveries. Specifically, to compare its efficacy with that of an adjacent Consultant-led Maternity Unit (CMU).
METHODS: Unpaired comparison of delivery procedures and outcomes at the Patan Hospital, Lalitpur. The sample was 988 women (550 at BC, 438 at CMU). Women judged to be at low risk of complications were enrolled at delivery at each facility. Information was collected by standardized interviews and record review. Main outcome measures were incidence of complications of labour, technical procedures and access to postnatal care and family planning services.
RESULTS: Artificial rupture of membranes was more likely to be performed at the BC (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44). Augmentation of labour with oxytocin was less likely to be performed (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.20-0.33), as was episiotomy (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57-0.72). The incidence of oxytocic augmentation was high at the CMU (205/438: 46.9%). The incidence of moderately or thickly meconium-stained liquor was lower at the BC than at the CMU (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.91), a finding that was associated with oxytocic augmentation of labour. No significant differences were found for duration or complications of labour, mode of delivery, birth weight, neonatal Apgar score or admission to the special care baby unit. Women delivering at the BC were more likely to attend both postnatal (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.51) and family planning clinics (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.44-2.38).
CONCLUSIONS: After appropriate screening, intrapartum care for low risk deliveries is effectively provided by midwives. The Birthing Centre model should be considered throughout the developing world, particularly as a site for training of skilled attendants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12917274     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czg039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  5 in total

Review 1.  60 Million non-facility births: who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths?

Authors:  Gary L Darmstadt; Anne C C Lee; Simon Cousens; Lynn Sibley; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; France Donnay; Dave Osrin; Abhay Bang; Vishwajeet Kumar; Steven N Wall; Abdullah Baqui; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qian Long; Emma R Allanson; Jennifer Pontre; Özge Tunçalp; George Justus Hofmeyr; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2016-09-02

4.  Quality of obstetric referral services in India's JSY cash transfer programme for institutional births: a study from Madhya Pradesh province.

Authors:  Sarika Chaturvedi; Bharat Randive; Vishal Diwan; Ayesha De Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Health system redesign for maternal and newborn survival: rethinking care models to close the global equity gap.

Authors:  Sanam Roder-DeWan; Kojo Nimako; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Archana Amatya; Ana Langer; Margaret Kruk
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.