Literature DB >> 12915593

CHOP compared with CHOP plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

J K Doorduijn1, B van der Holt, G W van Imhoff, K G van der Hem, M H H Kramer, M H J van Oers, G J Ossenkoppele, M R Schaafsma, L F Verdonck, G E G Verhoef, M M C Steijaert, I Buijt, C A Uyl-de Groot, M van Agthoven, A H Mulder, P Sonneveld.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the relative dose-intensity of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy could be improved by prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 65 to 90 years (median, 72 years) with stage II to IV aggressive NHL were randomly assigned to receive standard CHOP every 3 weeks or CHOP plus G-CSF every 3 weeks on days 2 to 11 of each cycle.
RESULTS: In 389 eligible patients, the relative dose intensities (RDIs) of cyclophosphamide (median, 96.3% v 93.9%; P =.01) and doxorubicin (median, 95.4% v 93.3%; P =.04) were higher in patients treated with CHOP plus G-CSF. The complete response rates were 55% and 52% for CHOP and CHOP plus G-CSF, respectively (P =.63). The actuarial overall survival at 5 years was 22% with CHOP alone, compared with 24% with CHOP plus G-CSF (P =.76), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Patients treated with CHOP plus G-CSF had an identical incidence of infections, with World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 (34 of 1,191 cycles v 36 of 1,195 cycles). Only the cumulative days with antibiotics were fewer with CHOP plus G-CSF (median, 0 v 6 days; P =.006) than with CHOP alone. The number of hospital admissions and the number of days in hospital were not different.
CONCLUSION: In elderly patients, G-CSF improved the RDI of CHOP, but this did not lead to a higher complete response rate or better overall survival. G-CSF did not prevent serious infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915593     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  Re: personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Jennifer L Malin; Benjamin Kim; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Senior adult oncology.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  SEOM clinical guidelines for myeloid growth factors.

Authors:  José Muñoz Langa; Pere Gascón; Javier de Castro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor overcomes neutropenia in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with higher cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Takeshi Hara; Hisashi Tsurumi; Senji Kasahara; Nobuhiro Kanemura; Takeshi Yoshikawa; Naoe Goto; Yasushi Kojima; Toshiki Yamada; Michio Sawada; Takeshi Takahashi; Masami Oyama; Eiichi Tomita; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the elderly: strategies integrating oncogeriatric themes.

Authors:  Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic colony stimulating factor: insights from a Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Scott A Strassels; Michael Dickson; Leann B Norris; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Long-term results of a multicenter randomized, comparative trial of modified CHOP versus THP-COP versus THP-COPE regimens in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Mayumi Mori; Kiyoshi Kitamura; Michihiko Masuda; Tomomitsu Hotta; Tamotsu Miyazaki; Akira B Miura; Hideaki Mizoguchi; Akira Shibata; Hidehiko Saito; Tamotsu Matsuda; Toru Masaoka; Mine Harada; Yoshiyuki Niho; Fumimaro Takaku
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-3L: assessing the external validity of existing mapping algorithms.

Authors:  Brett Doble; Paula Lorgelly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Patterns of growth factor usage and febrile neutropenia among older patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: the Intergroup experience (CALGB 9793; ECOG-SWOG 4494).

Authors:  Vicki A Morrison; Edie A Weller; Thomas M Habermann; Shuli Li; Richard I Fisher; Bruce D Cheson; Bruce A Peterson
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-12-14

10.  An assessment of the external validity of mapping QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D preferences.

Authors:  Ralph Crott; Matthijs Versteegh; Carin Uyl-de-Groot
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.