Ralph Crott1, Matthijs Versteegh, Carin Uyl-de-Groot. 1. Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, J-building—Campus Woudestein, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. rcrott@hotmail.co.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although cancer-specific Health-related Quality-of-Life measures are commonly included in randomized clinical trials or other prospective non-randomized clinical studies, it is rare that preference-based instruments are used, which allow the calculation of a Utility weight suitable for estimating Quality-adjusted Life-Years gained. OBJECTIVE: To test the external validity of a previously published mapping algorithm to transform the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire responses into EQ-5D-derived utilities by predicting EQ-5D utilities from QLQ-C30 scores. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Comparative retrospective data analysis of four multicentre, prospective clinical trials in Breast, Multiple Myeloma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Non-Small-Cell Lung cancer patients with, respectively, 219, 172, 132 and 172 patients. Regression analysis of individual pairs of EQ-5D and QLQ-C30 scores. RESULTS: Although the internal predictive power of a previously published mapping equation was high, its external validity when tested on a set of unrelated external data sets in other cancers proved to underestimate both the mean and variance of the mapped EQ-5D utilities. Furthermore, it appears that the relationship between QLQ-C30 scores and EQ-5D values is not stable across the different data sets. CONCLUSIONS: Validation of the proposed algorithm in other external clinical data sets should be encouraged as well as the application of other more complex mapping methods to enhance accuracy of mapping. In the meanwhile, direct mapping from QLQ-C30 profiles to EQ-5D utilities using published algorithms should be performed with reservations.
BACKGROUND: Although cancer-specific Health-related Quality-of-Life measures are commonly included in randomized clinical trials or other prospective non-randomized clinical studies, it is rare that preference-based instruments are used, which allow the calculation of a Utility weight suitable for estimating Quality-adjusted Life-Years gained. OBJECTIVE: To test the external validity of a previously published mapping algorithm to transform the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire responses into EQ-5D-derived utilities by predicting EQ-5D utilities from QLQ-C30 scores. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Comparative retrospective data analysis of four multicentre, prospective clinical trials in Breast, Multiple Myeloma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Non-Small-Cell Lung cancerpatients with, respectively, 219, 172, 132 and 172 patients. Regression analysis of individual pairs of EQ-5D and QLQ-C30 scores. RESULTS: Although the internal predictive power of a previously published mapping equation was high, its external validity when tested on a set of unrelated external data sets in other cancers proved to underestimate both the mean and variance of the mapped EQ-5D utilities. Furthermore, it appears that the relationship between QLQ-C30 scores and EQ-5D values is not stable across the different data sets. CONCLUSIONS: Validation of the proposed algorithm in other external clinical data sets should be encouraged as well as the application of other more complex mapping methods to enhance accuracy of mapping. In the meanwhile, direct mapping from QLQ-C30 profiles to EQ-5D utilities using published algorithms should be performed with reservations.
Authors: Matthijs M Versteegh; Annemieke Leunis; Jolanda J Luime; Mike Boggild; Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Elly A Stolk Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Wolfgang Greiner; Tom Weijnen; Martin Nieuwenhuizen; Siem Oppe; Xavier Badia; Jan Busschbach; Martin Buxton; Paul Dolan; Paul Kind; Paul Krabbe; Arto Ohinmaa; David Parkin; Montserat Roset; Harri Sintonen; Aki Tsuchiya; Frank de Charro Journal: Eur J Health Econ Date: 2003-09
Authors: Johan A Karlsson; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Martin Neovius; Lars-Erik Kristensen; Anders Gülfe; Tore Saxne; Pierre Geborek Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: I-Chan Huang; Constantine Frangakis; Mark J Atkinson; Richard J Willke; Walter L Leite; W Bruce Vogel; Albert W Wu Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: M Moskovitz; K Jao; J Su; M C Brown; H Naik; L Eng; T Wang; J Kuo; Y Leung; W Xu; N Mittmann; L Moody; L Barbera; G Devins; M Li; D Howell; G Liu Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Elvira Vos; Linetta Koppert; Winnifred van Lankeren; Cornelis Verhoef; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Myriam Hunink Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Anna Forsythe; Patricia S Brandt; Mike Dolph; Sachin Patel; Adrian Paul J Rabe; Gabriel Tremblay Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2018-01-25