OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work is to investigate comparative ablation rate between composite resins and dental hard tissues (enamel and dentin) after Er:YAG laser irradiation to verify possible development of an ultra-conservative dentistry to with minimum effect for the teeth tissue. METHODS: We have used 11 extracted or exfoliated primary anterior and posterior teeth and six extracted permanent molar teeth. Three different types of composite resin were chosen (microfiller, hybrid, and condensable) in terms of chemical and structural composition. Composite tablets and the teeth were irradiated with a Er:YAG laser at different laser beam energy level per pulse (100, 200, 300, and 400 mJ). Diameter and depth of each resulted microcavity were measured and the material removed volumes were calculated. The resulted values were plotted and fitted to allow a comparative observation of the material removed as a function of energy level per pulse. RESULTS: While the idea of ultra-conservative dentistry seems to apply well for enamel of primary and permanent teeth, at the present stage it does not apply well for primary or permanent dentin. For dentin, the composition and content of water makes the Er:YAG laser ablation equal or superior in rate compared with the three used resins. SIGNIFICANCE: This work presents of a comparative study of Er:YAG laser ablation, allowing to analyze the possible selective ablation between composite resin placed and cured and dental hard tissues, with the goal to propose a new clinical technique: differential ablation for composite resin restorations using Er:YAG laser. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work is to investigate comparative ablation rate between composite resins and dental hard tissues (enamel and dentin) after Er:YAG laser irradiation to verify possible development of an ultra-conservative dentistry to with minimum effect for the teeth tissue. METHODS: We have used 11 extracted or exfoliated primary anterior and posterior teeth and six extracted permanent molar teeth. Three different types of composite resin were chosen (microfiller, hybrid, and condensable) in terms of chemical and structural composition. Composite tablets and the teeth were irradiated with a Er:YAG laser at different laser beam energy level per pulse (100, 200, 300, and 400 mJ). Diameter and depth of each resulted microcavity were measured and the material removed volumes were calculated. The resulted values were plotted and fitted to allow a comparative observation of the material removed as a function of energy level per pulse. RESULTS: While the idea of ultra-conservative dentistry seems to apply well for enamel of primary and permanent teeth, at the present stage it does not apply well for primary or permanent dentin. For dentin, the composition and content of water makes the Er:YAG laser ablation equal or superior in rate compared with the three used resins. SIGNIFICANCE: This work presents of a comparative study of Er:YAG laser ablation, allowing to analyze the possible selective ablation between composite resin placed and cured and dental hard tissues, with the goal to propose a new clinical technique: differential ablation for composite resin restorations using Er:YAG laser. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Camila Scatena; Carolina Paes Torres; Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva; Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente; Jesus Djalma Pécora; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb; Maria Cristina Borsatto Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2010-04-02 Impact factor: 3.161