Literature DB >> 27853347

Surface treatment comparison by application of diamond bur and Er,Cr:YSGG at different powers: morphological and mechanical evaluation.

Mansoreh Mirzaie1, Esmael Yassini1, Ardavan Etemadi2, Atefeh Tavakoli1, Nasim Chiniforush3.   

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the micro-tensile bond strength of new and previous composite resin restorations after surface treatment with diamond bur and Er,Cr:YSGG laser at different power settings (2,3 and 4 W). Materials and methods: Micro-hybride composite resin was inserted in metallic mold 5 ×5 ×15 mm and cured for 40 sec according to manufacturer's instruction.12 blocks were made. The bonded surfaces of the 12 blocks so obtained were subsequently ground using Silicon Carbide papers 1200 grit, for 15 seconds under running water. Then the samples randomly were divided into 4 groups: (G1) Bur-treated, (G2) Er,Cr:YSGG laser with power of 2 W and energy of 100 mJ, (G3) Er,Cr:YSGG laser with power of 3 W and energy of 150 mJ, (G4) Er,Cr:YSGG laser with power of 4 W and energy of 200 mJ. One sample of each group was analyzed by SEM while, after cutting the blocks to 1 mm2 of area samples, the others samples were mechanically tested by Universal testing machine with the speed of 0.5 mm per minute till fracture point. Data were analysed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey Test.
Results: T-test showed no significantly differences between G2 and G4(P=0.064) while G3 demonstrated significant differences than G2 (P=0.001) and G4(P=0.000) and also between samples treated with bur (G1) and G2 (P=0.242) ,G3 (P=0.000) ,G4 (P=0.829); G1 didn't significantly differ to G2 and G4(P>0.05), while G1 and G3(P<0.05).
Conclusion: On surface treatment of repaired composite, samples treated by laser at 3W power showed better condition of micro-tensile bond strength.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bond strength; Er,Cr:YSGG laser; Microhybride composite

Year:  2016        PMID: 27853347      PMCID: PMC5108997          DOI: 10.5978/islsm.16-OR-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laser Ther        ISSN: 0898-5901


  18 in total

1.  Factors affecting the shear bond strength of bonded composite inlays.

Authors:  E Nilsson; S Alaeddin; S Karlsson; P Milleding; A Wennerberg
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites.

Authors:  C Lucena-Martín; S González-López; J M Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair.

Authors:  Nurhan Oztas; Alev Alaçam; Yener Bardakçy
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.440

4.  Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites.

Authors:  K J Söderholm; M J Roberts
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1991-04

5.  Comparison of the effect of three mechanical surface treatments on the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite.

Authors:  Soodabeh Kimyai; Narmin Mohammadi; Elmira Jafari Navimipour; Sahand Rikhtegaran
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin.

Authors:  Tammy Bonstein; Davis Garlapo; John Donarummo; Peter J Bush
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Evaluation of the surface roughness and morphologic features of Y-TZP ceramics after different surface treatments.

Authors:  Andrea N Cavalcanti; Peter Pilecki; Richard Mark Foxton; Timothy F Watson; Marcelo Tavares Oliveira; Marcelo Gianinni; Giselle M Marchi
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites.

Authors:  T Brosh; R Pilo; N Bichacho; R Blutstein
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths.

Authors:  E J Swift; B C Cloe; D B Boyer
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.

Authors:  Cafer Türkmen; Meral Durkan; Hale Cimilli; Mustafa Öksüz
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.