Literature DB >> 12913872

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities: implications from the outcome for couples with chromosomal rearrangements.

M Simopoulou1, J C Harper, E Fragouli, A Mantzouratou, B E Speyer, P Serhal, D M Ranieri, A Doshi, J Henderson, C H Rodeck, J D A Delhanty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chromosomal rearrangements can lead to infertility or repeated spontaneous or induced abortions. The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows the selected transfer of chromosomally balanced embryos. The aim of this study was to carry out detailed analysis of the outcome of 11 PGD cycles for 8 patients carrying various chromosomal rearrangements.
METHODS: Patients underwent routine in vitro fertilisation with biopsy of embryos on day 3. Specific fluorescent in situ hybridisation protocols were developed for each couple. Embryo transfer was possible in all 11 cycles.
RESULTS: The outcome was four pregnancies, leading to three live births and one biochemical pregnancy. Post-zygotic mosaicism was detected in 75% of untransferred embryos, the majority of which were chaotic. Detailed follow-up and analysis provided evidence for the co-existence of chromosomally balanced and abnormal cells in six embryos. The mechanisms involved included chromosome breakage and loss of material.
CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy and analysis of two blastomeres, where possible, reduced the risk of misdiagnosis in cases of balanced/aneuploid mosaics. The three live births achieved for the eight couples treated in this series, despite the poor history in almost all cases, is further proof that a policy of biopsying two cells from embryos consisting of six or more cells and a single cell from four- or five-cell embryos is compatible with a positive outcome. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913872     DOI: 10.1002/pd.662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

Review 1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Benefits and drawbacks of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocations: lessons from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven; Frances A Flinter; Yakoub Khalaf; Alison Lashwood; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  PGD management scheme for older females with balanced translocations: Do older females have less chance of balanced embryo transfer?

Authors:  Pinar Tulay; Meral Gültomruk; Necati Fındıklı; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-01-12

4.  Parental insertional balanced translocations are an important cause of apparently de novo CNVs in patients with developmental anomalies.

Authors:  Beata A Nowakowska; Nicole de Leeuw; Claudia Al Ruivenkamp; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; John A Crolla; Reinhilde Thoelen; Marije Koopmans; Nicolette den Hollander; Arie van Haeringen; Anne-Marie van der Kevie-Kersemaekers; Rolph Pfundt; Hanneke Mieloo; Ton van Essen; Bert B A de Vries; Andrew Green; Willie Reardon; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Male and female meiotic behaviour of an intrachromosomal insertion determined by preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Leoni Xanthopoulou; Anna Mantzouratou; Anastasia Mania; Suzanne Cawood; Alpesh Doshi; Domenico M Ranieri; Joy Da Delhanty
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Meiotic and mitotic behaviour of a ring/deleted chromosome 22 in human embryos determined by preimplantation genetic diagnosis for a maternal carrier.

Authors:  Anna Mantzouratou; Anastasia Mania; Marianna Apergi; Sarah Laver; Paul Serhal; Jda Delhanty
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.009

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.