Literature DB >> 12913844

Concordance between premortem and postmortem diagnosis in the autopsy: results of a 10-year study in a tertiary care center.

Jose M Ornelas-Aguirre1, Gonzalo Vázquez-Camacho, Laura Gonzalez-Lopez, Araceli Garcia-Gonzalez, Jorge I Gamez-Nava.   

Abstract

We describe the concordance between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a tertiary care center. Clinical autopsy is a useful tool for the evaluation of accuracy of the clinical diagnoses. However, autopsy rates have declined around the world recently. We randomly evaluated 500 of 2,211 autopsies performed in the department of pathology of a tertiary care hospital during a 10-year period. We computed the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and concordance scores between premortem and postmortem diagnoses. The autopsy diagnoses were used as the "gold standard." Four-hundred twenty-two (84.4%) of the autopsies met inclusion criteria. Diseases of the respiratory tract were diagnosed in 44.1% (186) of all autopsy reports reviewed. The higher sensitivity for diagnosis was observed in congenital anomalies (87.5%), while the higher specificity was observed in diagnosis of complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium (98.98%). The higher concordance between premortem and postmortem diagnosis was observed with the diagnoses of neoplasms (kappa = 0.76), and for the group of complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium (kappa = 0.76). A clinical diagnosis successfully addressed the cause of death in 40% of the cases Low values for concordance between autopsy reports and clinical diagnoses were present in most of the autopsies reports reviewed. We encourage physicians to continue considering the autopsy as an important tool that extends our understanding of diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913844     DOI: 10.1016/s1092-9134(03)00050-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1092-9134            Impact factor:   2.090


  6 in total

1.  Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy.

Authors:  Kimberly J O'Malley; Karon F Cook; Matt D Price; Kimberly Raiford Wildes; John F Hurdle; Carol M Ashton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Does the medical autopsy still have a place in the current diagnostic process? A 6-year retrospective study in two French University hospitals.

Authors:  Sarah Humez; Clémence Delteil; Claude Alain Maurage; Julia Torrents; Caroline Capuani; Lucile Tuchtan; Marie-Dominique Piercecchi
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Brain volume estimation from post-mortem newborn and fetal MRI.

Authors:  Eliza Orasanu; Andrew Melbourne; M Jorge Cardoso; Marc Modat; Andrew M Taylor; Sudhin Thayyil; Sebastien Ourselin
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.881

4.  The impact of autopsy participation on clinical residency.

Authors:  Kohta Katayama; Yuji Nishizaki; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Yuta Saitoh; Tetsuhiro Yano; Takuya Aoki; Masayuki Noguchi; Yasuharu Tokuda
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2021-05-03

5.  Clinico-pathological discrepancies in the diagnosis of causes of maternal death in sub-Saharan Africa: retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jaume Ordi; Mamudo R Ismail; Carla Carrilho; Cleofé Romagosa; Nafissa Osman; Fernanda Machungo; Josep A Bombí; Juan Balasch; Pedro L Alonso; Clara Menéndez
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Concordance between clinical diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism at hospital discharge and anatomopathological diagnosis.

Authors:  Benjamín Rubio-Jurado; Rocío Concepción Albores-Arguijo; Antonio Guerra-Soto; Teresita Plasencia-Ortiz; Gerónimo Tavarez-Macías; Jennifer Huerta-Hernández; Carlos Riebeling-Navarro; Arnulfo Hernán Nava-Zavala
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.219

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.