Literature DB >> 12913727

Sociodemographic and clinical risk characteristics of patients with prostate cancer within the Veterans Affairs health care system: data from CaPSURE.

Matthew R Cooperberg1, Deborah P Lubeck, David F Penson, Shilpa S Mehta, Peter R Carroll, Christopher J Kane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system investigators perform large clinical trials in prostate cancer treatment but potential differences between VA and other patient cohorts have not been explored systematically.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor is an ongoing observational database of men with prostate cancer, comprising 7,202 patients treated at 35 sites across the United States. Three sites that together contribute 241 patients are VA medical centers. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between all VA and nonVA patients in the database and a multivariate model was used to explore the interactions between ethnicity and VA status for predicting clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: VA patients were 4 times as likely as nonVA patients to be black. They had lower income, less education and more co-morbidity at presentation (all comparisons p <0.0001). VA patients had higher risk disease. Mean serum prostate specific antigen at diagnosis was 20.1 vs 15.3 ng/ml for nonVA patients (p = 0.003). Mean Gleason score was 6.4 for VA patients vs 6.0 for nonVA patients (p <0.0001). Differing ethnic distributions explained the differences in prostate specific antigen between VA and nonVA patients. However, VA status, socioeconomic level and ethnicity independently predicted Gleason score. VA patients were more likely to undergo watchful waiting or primary hormonal therapy and less likely to receive definitive local treatment (p <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant sociodemographic and clinical differences exist between VA and nonVA patients, which should be borne in mind when extrapolating the results of VA clinical trials to the general population. These observations require validation in larger patient cohorts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913727     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081200.63275.0b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  The importance of active surveillance, and immediate re-biopsy in low-risk prostate cancer: The largest series from Turkey.

Authors:  Göksel Bayar; Kaya Horasanlı; Hüseyin Acinikli; Orhan Tanrıverdi; Ayhan Dalkılıç; Serdar Arısan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

2.  Long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy under an early salvage policy for patients with T3-T4N0M0 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Mizowaki; Yoshiki Norihisa; Kenji Takayama; Itaru Ikeda; Haruo Inokuchi; Kiyonao Nakamura; Tomomi Kamba; Takahiro Inoue; Toshiyuki Kamoto; Osamu Ogawa; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Outcomes after radical prostatectomy among men who are candidates for active surveillance: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Ronald Im; Christopher L Amling; Joseph C Presti; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Sexual self-esteem and psychosocial functioning in military veterans after cancer.

Authors:  Maggie L Syme; Eileen Delaney; Jennifer Schuster Wachen; Jeffrey Gosian; Jennifer Moye
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2013

5.  Life expectancy estimates for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Ericka M Sohlberg; I-Chun Thomas; Jaden Yang; Kristopher Kapphahn; Timothy J Daskivich; Ted A Skolarus; Jeremy B Shelton; Danil V Makarov; Jonathan Bergman; Christine Ko Bang; Mary K Goldstein; Todd H Wagner; James D Brooks; Manisha Desai; John T Leppert
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Overall Survival in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer in the US Veterans Health Administration: Is PIVOT Generalizable?

Authors:  Philip V Barbosa; I-Chun Thomas; Sandy Srinivas; Mark K Buyyounouski; Benjamin I Chung; Glenn M Chertow; Steven M Asch; Todd H Wagner; James D Brooks; John T Leppert
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  The primary therapy chosen for patients with localized prostate cancer between the university hospital and its affiliated hospitals in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group registration.

Authors:  Nobumichi Tanaka; Kiyohide Fujimoto; Akihide Hirayama; Shoji Samma; Hitoshi Momose; Yoshiteru Kaneko; Masaki Haramoto; Yoshiki Hayashi; Yoshinori Nakagawa; Takeshi Otani; Shuji Watanabe; Yoshihiko Hirao
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Risk factors of PSA progression and overall survival in patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Atsushi Tomioka; Nobumichi Tanaka; Motokiyo Yoshikawa; Makito Miyake; Satoshi Anai; Yoshitomo Chihara; Eijiro Okajima; Akihide Hirayama; Yoshihiko Hirao; Kiyohide Fujimoto
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  American trends in expectant management utilization for prostate cancer from 2000 to 2009.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Robert Abouassaly; Hui Zhu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Patterns of practice in the United States: insights from CaPSURE on prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; David M Latini; Mark S Litwin; Katrine L Wallace; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.