Philip V Barbosa1, I-Chun Thomas1, Sandy Srinivas2, Mark K Buyyounouski3, Benjamin I Chung1, Glenn M Chertow4, Steven M Asch2, Todd H Wagner5, James D Brooks1, John T Leppert6. 1. Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 3. Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 6. Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address: jleppert@stanford.edu.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: A better understanding of overall survival among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is critical to inform PCa treatment decisions, especially in light of data from the Prostate Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT). We sought to describe patterns of survival for all patients with clinically localized PCa treated by the VHA. We created an analytic cohort of 35 954 patients with clinically localized PCa diagnosed from 1995 to 2001, approximating the PIVOT inclusion criteria (age of diagnosis ≤75 yr and clinical stage T2 or lower). Mean patient age was 65.9 yr, and median follow-up was 161 mo. Overall, 22.5% of patients were treated with surgery, 16.6% were treated with radiotherapy, and 23.1% were treated with androgen deprivation. Median survival of the entire cohort was 14 yr (25th, 75th percentiles, range: 7.9-20 yr). Among patients who received treatment with curative intent, median survival was 17.9 yr following surgery and 12.9 yr following radiotherapy. One-third of patients died within 10 yr of diagnosis compared with nearly half of the participants in PIVOT. This finding sounds a note of caution when generalizing the mortality data from PIVOT to VHA patients and those in the community. PATIENT SUMMARY: More than one-third of patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer treated through the US Veterans Health Administration from 1995 to 2001 died within 10 yr of their diagnosis. Caution should be used when generalizing the estimates of competing mortality data from PIVOT. Published by Elsevier B.V.
UNLABELLED: A better understanding of overall survival among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is critical to inform PCa treatment decisions, especially in light of data from the Prostate Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT). We sought to describe patterns of survival for all patients with clinically localized PCa treated by the VHA. We created an analytic cohort of 35 954 patients with clinically localized PCa diagnosed from 1995 to 2001, approximating the PIVOT inclusion criteria (age of diagnosis ≤75 yr and clinical stage T2 or lower). Mean patient age was 65.9 yr, and median follow-up was 161 mo. Overall, 22.5% of patients were treated with surgery, 16.6% were treated with radiotherapy, and 23.1% were treated with androgen deprivation. Median survival of the entire cohort was 14 yr (25th, 75th percentiles, range: 7.9-20 yr). Among patients who received treatment with curative intent, median survival was 17.9 yr following surgery and 12.9 yr following radiotherapy. One-third of patients died within 10 yr of diagnosis compared with nearly half of the participants in PIVOT. This finding sounds a note of caution when generalizing the mortality data from PIVOT to VHA patients and those in the community. PATIENT SUMMARY: More than one-third of patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer treated through the US Veterans Health Administration from 1995 to 2001 died within 10 yr of their diagnosis. Caution should be used when generalizing the estimates of competing mortality data from PIVOT. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Entities:
Keywords:
Competing risks of mortality; Prostate cancer; Survival; Veterans Health Administration
Authors: Leah L Zullig; George L Jackson; Raye Anne Dorn; Dawn T Provenzale; Rebecca McNeil; Catherine M Thomas; Michael J Kelley Journal: Mil Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Steven M Asch; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Mary M Hogan; Rodney A Hayward; Paul Shekelle; Lisa Rubenstein; Joan Keesey; John Adams; Eve A Kerr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-12-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Elizabeth B Lamont; Samuel R Bozeman; Steven H Krasnow; Lawrence Shulman; Jennifer R Brown; Craig C Earle; Michael Rabin; Barbara J McNeil Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Tatsuki Koyama; Kang-Hsien Fan; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; David F Penson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: William H Rogers; Lewis E Kazis; Donald R Miller; Katherine M Skinner; Jack A Clark; Avron Spiro; R Graeme Fincke Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2004 Jul-Sep
Authors: Lewis E Kazis; Donald R Miller; Katherine M Skinner; Austin Lee; Xinhua S Ren; Jack A Clark; William H Rogers; Avron Spiro; Alfredo Selim; Mark Linzer; Susan M Payne; Dorcas Mansell; R Graeme Fincke Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2004 Jan-Mar
Authors: Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robin Wm Vernooij; Michelle Lancee; Anne Cleves; Philipp Dahm; Chris H Bangma; Katja Kh Aben Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-06-04
Authors: Christopher J Magnani; Kevin Li; Tina Seto; Kathryn M McDonald; Douglas W Blayney; James D Brooks; Tina Hernandez-Boussard Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ericka M Sohlberg; I-Chun Thomas; Jaden Yang; Kristopher Kapphahn; Timothy J Daskivich; Ted A Skolarus; Jeremy B Shelton; Danil V Makarov; Jonathan Bergman; Christine Ko Bang; Mary K Goldstein; Todd H Wagner; James D Brooks; Manisha Desai; John T Leppert Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Simon John Christoph Soerensen; I-Chun Thomas; Bogdana Schmidt; Timothy J Daskivich; Ted A Skolarus; Christian Jackson; Thomas F Osborne; Glenn M Chertow; James D Brooks; David H Rehkopf; John T Leppert Journal: Urology Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 2.633