J Christopher Glantz1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Labor induction rates in the United States rose from 9.0 percent in 1989 to 20.5 percent in 2001, but reasons for the increase are poorly defined. A birth database from a region of upstate New York, including 31,352 deliveries from 1998 through 1999, was used to determine the degree of variation of labor induction rates among hospitals and practitioners. METHODS: Total and elective labor induction rates were calculated for 16 hospitals and individual staff, and then evaluated using chi-square testing and regression. RESULTS: Using all laboring women as the denominator, the regional labor induction rate was 20.8 percent; of these inductions, 25 percent had no apparent medical indication. Total induction rates and percent of elective inductions that were elective varied significantly among hospitals (10%-39% and 12%-55%, respectively, p<0.0001) and among practitioners within hospitals (7%-48% and 3%-76%, respectively, p<0.0001). Hospitals varied in size, risk status, and cesarean section rates, but these factors did not correlate with induction rates. CONCLUSIONS: Labor induction rates are highly variable among and within hospitals. Delivery volume, population risk status, and differences in cesarean section rates did not explain this variation.
BACKGROUND:Labor induction rates in the United States rose from 9.0 percent in 1989 to 20.5 percent in 2001, but reasons for the increase are poorly defined. A birth database from a region of upstate New York, including 31,352 deliveries from 1998 through 1999, was used to determine the degree of variation of labor induction rates among hospitals and practitioners. METHODS: Total and elective labor induction rates were calculated for 16 hospitals and individual staff, and then evaluated using chi-square testing and regression. RESULTS: Using all laboring women as the denominator, the regional labor induction rate was 20.8 percent; of these inductions, 25 percent had no apparent medical indication. Total induction rates and percent of elective inductions that were elective varied significantly among hospitals (10%-39% and 12%-55%, respectively, p<0.0001) and among practitioners within hospitals (7%-48% and 3%-76%, respectively, p<0.0001). Hospitals varied in size, risk status, and cesarean section rates, but these factors did not correlate with induction rates. CONCLUSIONS:Labor induction rates are highly variable among and within hospitals. Delivery volume, population risk status, and differences in cesarean section rates did not explain this variation.
Authors: Sofia R Aliaga; P Brian Smith; Wayne A Price; Thomas S Ivester; Kim Boggess; Sue Tolleson-Rinehart; Martin J McCaffrey; Matthew M Laughon Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2013-01
Authors: Sofia Aliaga; Jun Zhang; D Leann Long; Amy H Herring; Matthew Laughon; Kim Boggess; Uma M Reddy; Katherine Laughon Grantz Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Joshua P Vogel; Alfred O Osoti; Anthony J Kelly; Stefania Livio; Jane E Norman; Zarko Alfirevic Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-09-13