Literature DB >> 12911777

Thresholds of clinical reactivity to milk, egg, peanut and sesame in immunoglobulin E-dependent allergies: evaluation by double-blind or single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenges.

M Morisset1, D A Moneret-Vautrin, G Kanny, L Guénard, E Beaudouin, J Flabbée, R Hatahet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of food anaphylaxis due to masked allergens has increased within the last 10 years. Contamination of manufactured products by food allergens is a key concern for food industries.
OBJECTIVE: To determine quantities eliciting reactions in patients who have an IgE-dependent food allergy, thanks to standardized oral provocation tests. To evaluate the subsequent levels of sensitivity required for the detection tests of allergens for egg, peanut, milk and sesame.
METHODS: Prick-in-prick tests, Cap system RAST, and single or double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (SBPCFC or DBPCFC) were performed. The doses of natural food were gradually increased from 5 to 5000 mg for solid food and from 1 to 30 mL for peanut oil, sunflower oil, soy oil and sesame oil.
RESULTS: Data from 125 positive oral challenges to egg, 103 to peanut, 59 to milk and 12 to sesame seeds were analysed. Haemodynamic modifications were observed in 2%, 3%, 1.7%, and 8% of the oral challenges (OCs) to egg, peanut, milk and sesame, respectively. Respiratory symptoms were observed in 12%, 20%, 10% and 42% of egg, peanut milk and sesame allergies, respectively. A cumulative reactive dose inferior or equal to 65 mg of solid food or 0.8 mL of milk characterized 16%, 18%, 5% and 8% of egg, peanut, milk and sesame allergies, respectively. 0.8% of egg allergies, 3.9% of peanut allergies, and 1.7% of milk allergies reacted to 10 mg or less of solid food or to 0.1 mL for milk. The lowest reactive threshold has been observed at less than 2 mg of egg; 5 mg of peanut, 0.1 mL of milk and 30 mg of sesame seed. Ten out of 29 OC with peanut oil, two out of two OC with soy oil and three out of six OC with sunflower oil were positive. Five out six OC with sesame oil were positive: 1 and 5 mL induced an anaphylactic shock.
CONCLUSION: The risk of asthma and anaphylactic shock to sesame and peanut is confirmed. Minimal reactive quantities show that, in order to guarantee a 95% safety for patients who are allergic to egg, peanut and milk, and on the basis of consumption of 100 g of food, the detection tests should ensure a sensitivity of 10 p.p.m. for egg, 24 p.p.m. for peanut and 30 p.p.m. for milk proteins. Oil allergies being considered, the limit of sensitivity should fall to 5 p.p.m.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12911777     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01734.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  11 in total

1.  The diagnosis and management of egg allergy.

Authors:  Ralf G Heine; Nora Laske; David J Hill
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Walnut allergy in peanut-allergic patients: significance of sequential epitopes of walnut homologous to linear epitopes of Ara h 1, 2 and 3 in relation to clinical reactivity.

Authors:  Leonard Rosenfeld; Wayne Shreffler; Ludmilla Bardina; Bodo Niggemann; Ulrich Wahn; Hugh A Sampson; Kirsten Beyer
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 3.  Fatal anaphylaxis to foods: epidemiology, recognition, and prevention.

Authors:  Dan Atkins; S Allan Bock
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines.

Authors:  Alessandro Fiocchi; Jan Brozek; Holger Schünemann; Sami L Bahna; Andrea von Berg; Kirsten Beyer; Martin Bozzola; Julia Bradsher; Enrico Compalati; Motohiro Ebisawa; Maria Antonieta Guzman; Haiqi Li; Ralf G Heine; Paul Keith; Gideon Lack; Massimo Landi; Alberto Martelli; Fabienne Rancé; Hugh Sampson; Airton Stein; Luigi Terracciano; Stefan Vieths
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 5.  Common methodologies in the evaluation of food allergy: pitfalls and prospects of food allergy prevalence studies.

Authors:  Shang-an Shu; Christopher Chang; Patrick S C Leung
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  Food production and processing considerations of allergenic food ingredients: a review.

Authors:  Pedro A Alvarez; Joyce I Boye
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-12-01

7.  Ovomucoid specific immunoglobulin E as a predictor of tolerance to cooked egg.

Authors:  Lisa M Bartnikas; William J Sheehan; Katherine L Tuttle; Carter R Petty; Lynda C Schneider; Wanda Phipatanakul
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2015-01

8.  Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges in children with alleged cow's milk allergy: prevention of unnecessary elimination diets and determination of eliciting doses.

Authors:  Wendy M Dambacher; Ellen H M de Kort; W Marty Blom; Geert F Houben; Esther de Vries
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 9.  Nano-Biosensing Platforms for Detection of Cow's Milk Allergens: An Overview.

Authors:  Monika Nehra; Mariagrazia Lettieri; Neeraj Dilbaghi; Sandeep Kumar; Giovanna Marrazza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Detection and Quantification of Milk Ingredients as Hidden Allergens in Meat Products by a Novel Specific Real-Time PCR Method.

Authors:  Caterina Villa; Joana Costa; Isabel Mafra
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.