BACKGROUND: The association between life events and hopelessness in a general population is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the course of hopelessness and how positive and negative life events are associated with it. METHOD: This was a 2- year follow-up study among general population adults, excluding any with a mental disorder. The impact of 15 occasional life events during the follow-up was assessed and the course of hopelessness measured with the Beck Hopelessness Scale (HS). RESULTS: Four percent of the study subjects with no hopelessness at baseline and 56% of those with hopelessness at baseline reported hopelessness on follow-up. In multiple logistic regression analyses, a notable worsening of the subjective financial situation was revealed as the most important life event, both in becoming hopeless during the follow-up (OR 5.07; 95% CI 2.20-11.7) and in continued hopelessness (OR 7.51, 95% CI 2.19-25.8). Moreover, considerable interpersonal conflicts at work (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.17-9.27) were associated with becoming hopeless. However, a notable positive change in common living conditions (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.74) was found to be a protective factor against becoming hopeless. All these variables remained significant even when adjusted for change in depression scores (BDI). CONCLUSION: Hopelessness may be persistent in a general population. The impact of life events, especially a notable worsening of the subjective financial situation, is important in becoming or remaining hopeless.
BACKGROUND: The association between life events and hopelessness in a general population is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the course of hopelessness and how positive and negative life events are associated with it. METHOD: This was a 2- year follow-up study among general population adults, excluding any with a mental disorder. The impact of 15 occasional life events during the follow-up was assessed and the course of hopelessness measured with the Beck Hopelessness Scale (HS). RESULTS: Four percent of the study subjects with no hopelessness at baseline and 56% of those with hopelessness at baseline reported hopelessness on follow-up. In multiple logistic regression analyses, a notable worsening of the subjective financial situation was revealed as the most important life event, both in becoming hopeless during the follow-up (OR 5.07; 95% CI 2.20-11.7) and in continued hopelessness (OR 7.51, 95% CI 2.19-25.8). Moreover, considerable interpersonal conflicts at work (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.17-9.27) were associated with becoming hopeless. However, a notable positive change in common living conditions (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.74) was found to be a protective factor against becoming hopeless. All these variables remained significant even when adjusted for change in depression scores (BDI). CONCLUSION: Hopelessness may be persistent in a general population. The impact of life events, especially a notable worsening of the subjective financial situation, is important in becoming or remaining hopeless.
Authors: Uchechi A Mitchell; Jennifer A Ailshire; Lauren L Brown; Morgan E Levine; Eileen M Crimmins Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Maarit Valtonen; David E Laaksonen; Jari Laukkanen; Tommi Tolmunen; Rainer Rauramaa; Heimo Viinamäki; Jussi Kauhanen; Timo Lakka; Leo Niskanen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 3.295