Literature DB >> 12909682

Measurement of voluntary activation of fresh and fatigued human muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Gabrielle Todd1, Janet L Taylor, S C Gandevia.   

Abstract

Recently, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex (TMS) revealed impaired voluntary activation of muscles during maximal efforts. Hence, we evaluated its use as a measure of voluntary activation over a range of contraction strengths in both fresh and fatigued muscles, and compared it with standard twitch interpolation using nerve stimulation. Subjects contracted the elbow flexors isometrically while force and EMG from biceps and triceps were recorded. In one study, eight subjects made submaximal and maximal test contractions with rests to minimise fatigue. In the second study, eight subjects made sustained maximal contractions to reduce force to 60 % of the initial value, followed by brief test contractions. Force responses were recorded following TMS or electrical stimulation of the biceps motor nerve. In other contractions, EMG responses to TMS (motor evoked potentials, MEPs) or to stimulation at the brachial plexus (maximal M waves, Mmax) were recorded. During contractions of 50 % maximum, TMS elicited large MEPs in biceps (> 90 % Mmax) which decreased in size (to approximately 70 % Mmax) with maximal efforts. This suggests that faster firing rates made some motor units effectively refractory. With fatigue, MEPs were also smaller but remained > 70 % Mmax for contractions of 50-100 % maximum. For fresh and fatigued muscle, the superimposed twitch evoked by motor nerve and motor cortex stimulation decreased with increasing contraction strength. For nerve stimulation the relation was curvilinear, and for TMS it was linear for contractions of 50-100 % maximum (r2 = 1.00). Voluntary activation was derived using the expression: (1 - superimposed twitch/resting twitch) x 100. The resting twitch was measured directly for nerve stimulation and for TMS, it was estimated by extrapolation of the linear regression between the twitch and voluntary force. For cortical stimulation, this resulted in a highly linear relation between voluntary activation and force. Furthermore, the estimated activation corresponded well with contraction strength. Using TMS or nerve stimulation, voluntary activation was high during maximal efforts of fresh muscle. With fatigue, both measures revealed reduced voluntary activation (i.e. central fatigue) during maximal efforts. Measured with TMS, this central fatigue accounted for one-quarter of the fall in maximal voluntary force. We conclude that TMS can quantify voluntary activation for fresh or fatigued muscles at forces of 50-100 % maximum. Unlike standard twitch interpolation of the elbow flexors, voluntary activation measured with TMS varies in proportion to voluntary force, it reveals when extra output is available from the motor cortex to increase force, and it elicits force from all relevant synergist muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12909682      PMCID: PMC2343213          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  34 in total

1.  Voluntary strength and fatigue.

Authors:  P A MERTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Activation of human respiratory muscles during different voluntary manoeuvres.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D K McKenzie; B L Plassman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; B L Day; S Boyd; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Impulse propagation and muscle activation in long maximal voluntary contractions.

Authors:  C K Thomas; J J Woods; B Bigland-Ritchie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1989-11

5.  Maximal activation of the human diaphragm but not inspiratory intercostal muscles during static inspiratory efforts.

Authors:  D K McKenzie; B L Plassman; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1988-06-17       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses.

Authors:  B L Day; D Dressler; A Maertens de Noordhout; C D Marsden; K Nakashima; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Scope of a technique for electrical stimulation of human brain, spinal cord, and muscle.

Authors:  P A Merton; D K Hill; H B Morton; C D Marsden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Facilitation of motor evoked potentials from magnetic brain stimulation in man: a comparative study of different target muscles.

Authors:  U Kischka; R Fajfr; T Fellenberg; C W Hess
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Are humans able to voluntarily elicit maximum muscle force?

Authors:  J J Dowling; E Konert; P Ljucovic; D M Andrews
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1994-09-26       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Muscle performance, voluntary activation, twitch properties and perceived effort in normal subjects and patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  A R Lloyd; S C Gandevia; J P Hales
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  97 in total

1.  Post-stroke fatigue: a deficit in corticomotor excitability?

Authors:  Annapoorna Kuppuswamy; Ella V Clark; Isobel F Turner; John C Rothwell; Nick S Ward
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Decline in voluntary activation contributes to reduced maximal performance of fatigued human lower limb muscles.

Authors:  K N Mileva; D P Sumners; J L Bowtell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Constraints for control of the human hand.

Authors:  Hiske van Duinen; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Intensity-dependent alterations in the excitability of cortical and spinal projections to the knee extensors during isometric and locomotor exercise.

Authors:  J C Weavil; S K Sidhu; T S Mangum; R S Richardson; M Amann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Unlike voluntary contractions, stimulated contractions of a hand muscle do not reduce voluntary activation or motoneuronal excitability.

Authors:  J M D'Amico; D M Rouffet; S C Gandevia; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-04-23

6.  Maximal force, voluntary activation and muscle soreness after eccentric damage to human elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  O Prasartwuth; J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Stressor-induced increase in muscle fatigability of young men and women is predicted by strength but not voluntary activation.

Authors:  Manda L Keller-Ross; Hugo M Pereira; Jaclyn Pruse; Tejin Yoon; Bonnie Schlinder-Delap; Kristy A Nielson; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-02-13

8.  Sex differences in central and peripheral mechanisms of fatigue in cyclists.

Authors:  Beth W Glace; Ian J Kremenic; Malachy P McHugh
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses.

Authors:  S K Hunter
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 6.311

Review 10.  Corticospinal responses to sustained locomotor exercises: moving beyond single-joint studies of central fatigue.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.