Literature DB >> 25367024

Post-stroke fatigue: a deficit in corticomotor excitability?

Annapoorna Kuppuswamy1, Ella V Clark2, Isobel F Turner2, John C Rothwell2, Nick S Ward2.   

Abstract

The pathophysiology of post-stroke fatigue is poorly understood although it is thought to be a consequence of central nervous system pathophysiology. In this study we investigate the relationship between corticomotor excitability and self-reported non-exercise related fatigue in chronic stroke population. Seventy first-time non-depressed stroke survivors (60.36 ± 12.4 years, 20 females, 56.81 ± 63 months post-stroke) with minimal motor and cognitive impairment were included in the cross-sectional observational study. Fatigue was measured using two validated questionnaires: Fatigue Severity Scale 7 and Neurological Fatigue Index - Stroke. Perception of effort was measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale in an isometric biceps hold-task and was used as a secondary measure of fatigue. Neurophysiological measures of corticomotor excitability were performed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Corticospinal excitability was quantified using resting and active motor thresholds and stimulus-response curves of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Intracortical M1 excitability was measured using paired pulse paradigms: short and long interval intracortical inhibition in the same hand muscle as above. Excitability of cortical and subcortical inputs that drive M1 output was measured in the biceps muscle using a modified twitch interpolation technique to provide an index of central activation failure. Stepwise regression was performed to determine the explanatory variables that significantly accounted for variance in the fatigue and perception scores. Resting motor threshold (R = 0.384; 95% confidence interval = 0.071; P = 0.036) accounted for 14.7% (R(2)) of the variation in Fatigue Severity Scale 7. Central activation failure (R = 0.416; 95% confidence interval = -1.618; P = 0.003) accounted for 17.3% (R(2)) of the variation in perceived effort score. Thus chronic stroke survivors with high fatigue exhibit high motor thresholds and those who perceive high effort have low excitability of inputs that drive motor cortex output. We suggest that low excitability of both corticospinal output and its facilitatory synaptic inputs from cortical and sub-cortical sites contribute to high levels of fatigue after stroke.
© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioural neurology; motor cortex; motor evoked potentials; stroke rehabilitation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25367024      PMCID: PMC4441078          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  67 in total

1.  Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex.

Authors:  W Gerschlager; H R Siebner; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; B L Day; S Boyd; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.969

3.  Fatigue among stroke patients on long-term follow-up. The Bergen Stroke Study.

Authors:  Halvor Naess; Lene Lunde; Jan Brogger; Ulrike Waje-Andreassen
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  Motor cortex excitability and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  J Liepert; D Mingers; C Heesen; T Bäumer; C Weiller
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 5.  Fatigue after stroke: a major but neglected issue.

Authors:  F Staub; J Bogousslavsky
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 6.  Frequency, characterisation and therapies of fatigue after stroke.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Annoni; Fabienne Staub; Julien Bogousslavsky; Andrea Brioschi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Ketamine increases human motor cortex excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; P Profice; M A Pennisi; F Pilato; G Zito; M Dileone; R Nicoletti; P Pasqualetti; P A Tonali
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Decreased capacity for mental effort after single supratentorial lacunar infarct may affect performance in everyday life.

Authors:  M J Van Zandvoort; L J Kappelle; A Algra; E H De Haan
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Poststroke fatigue: the patient perspective.

Authors:  C A Young; R J Mills; C Gibbons; E W Thornton
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.119

10.  Cortico-cortical modulation induced by 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the temporal cortex.

Authors:  Mina Lee; Song E Kim; Won Sup Kim; Jooman Han; Hee-Jin Kim; Hee Jin Kim; Bom Sahn Kim; Ji Young Kim; Seung Bong Hong; Byung Gon Kim; Hyang Woon Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.077

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement?

Authors:  Jens Bo Nielsen; Mark Schram Christensen; Simon Francis Farmer; Jakob Lorentzen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Interventions for post-stroke fatigue.

Authors:  Simiao Wu; Mansur A Kutlubaev; Ho-Yan Y Chun; Eileen Cowey; Alex Pollock; Malcolm R Macleod; Martin Dennis; Elizabeth Keane; Michael Sharpe; Gillian E Mead
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-02

3.  Motor cortical thickness is related to effort-based decision-making in humans.

Authors:  Amith Umesh; Kwame S Kutten; Patrick S Hogan; J Tilak Ratnanather; Vikram S Chib
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effort, success, and side of lesion determine arm choice in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Cheol E Han; Bokkyu Kim; Carolee J Winstein; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke fatigue.

Authors:  William De Doncker; Sasha Ondobaka; Annapoorna Kuppuswamy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Prevalence of fatigue in patients 3 months after stroke and association with early motor activity: a prospective study comparing stroke patients with a matched general population cohort.

Authors:  Thorlene Egerton; Anne Hokstad; Torunn Askim; Julie Bernhardt; Bent Indredavik
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  A case to be made: theoretical and empirical arguments for the need to consider fatigue in post-stroke motor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Annette Sterr; Leonardo Furlan
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.135

8.  Reliability and validity of a vertical numerical rating scale supplemented with a faces rating scale in measuring fatigue after stroke.

Authors:  Li-Ling Chuang; Keh-Chung Lin; An-Lun Hsu; Ching-Yi Wu; Ku-Chou Chang; Yen-Chen Li; You-Lin Chen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Factors Associated with Poststroke Fatigue: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amélie Ponchel; Stéphanie Bombois; Régis Bordet; Hilde Hénon
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2015-05-25

10.  A Systematic Review of Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition as a Biomarker in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Parmis Fatih; M Utku Kucuker; Jennifer L Vande Voort; Deniz Doruk Camsari; Faranak Farzan; Paul E Croarkin
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.