Literature DB >> 12909506

Social stigma and compounded losses: quality-of-life issues for multiple-birth families.

Marcia A Ellison1, Janet E Hall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality-of-life domains most impacted by multiple births.
DESIGN: Focus groups, qualitative research.
SETTING: Human volunteers in a medical research environment.Forty-three mothers, 29 raising multiple-birth children, 13 raising singletons, identified from random and convenience samples. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maternal self-reports of the psychosocial sequelae of multiple or singleton births, based on qualitative data analysis of transcribed group discussions. RESULT(S): The quality-of-life domains that were most impacted by raising multiple birth children were social stigma, pregnancy loss, marital satisfaction, children's health, unmet family needs, parenting stress, maternal depression, and the infertility experience. CONCLUSION(S): Qualitative methods identified two novel quality-of-life domains in iatrogenic multiple birth families: social stigma and compounded losses. An unexpected finding was the potential for increased marital solidification as parents coped with the inordinate stresses of multiple births. As anticipated, children's health, unmet family needs, maternal depression, and parental stress were key areas of concern. In addition, the infertility experience had a lasting impact. These findings are significant, given that at least 38% of all assisted conceptions result in a multiple birth. This study lays the groundwork for further research on the impact of iatrogenic multiple births.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12909506     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00659-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

Review 1.  Application of legal principles and medical ethics: multifetal pregnancy and fetal reduction.

Authors:  M A Cheong; S K Tay
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Day 3 ET, single blastocyst transfer (SBT) or frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET): which is preferable for high responder patients in IVF/ICSI cycles?

Authors:  Keliang Wu; Haibin Zhao; Hui Liu; Mei Li; Shuiying Ma; Cheng Li; Chang Liu; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The Stigma Complex.

Authors:  Bernice A Pescosolido; Jack K Martin
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2015-05-04

Review 4.  Raising multiples: mental health of mothers and fathers in early parenthood.

Authors:  Susan J Wenze; Cynthia L Battle; Katherine M Tezanos
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Aaron K Styer; Barbara Luke; Wendy Vitek; Mindy S Christianson; Valerie L Baker; Alicia Y Christy; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Second try: who returns for additional assisted reproductive technology treatment and the effect of a prior assisted reproductive technology birth.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Valerie L Baker; Daniel R Grow; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Maternal risk factors for potential maltreatment deaths among healthy singleton and twin infants.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.587

8.  Optimizing the number of embryos to transfer on day 5: two should be the limit.

Authors:  Claudio Ruhlmann; Lucas Molina; Graciano Tessari; Felicitas Ruhlmann; Lautaro Tessari; Diego Gnocchi; Antonio Cattaneo; Marcela Irigoyen; Alejandro Gustavo Martínez
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-02-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.