Literature DB >> 12909210

Biochemical failure as a determinant of distant metastasis and death in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Alan Pollack1, Alexandra L Hanlon, Benjamin Movsas, Gerald E Hanks, Robert Uzzo, Eric M Horwitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biochemical failure (BF), defined by a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) profile, is an early surrogate of treatment failure. However, little evidence is available to show that BF is associated with death for patents with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. We examined the relationship between BF and death from prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 942 patients were treated between 1987 and 1998 with external beam radiotherapy who had sufficient PSA determinations in follow-up for the analyses described. The median radiation dose was 72 Gy, median PSA was 9.9 ng/mL, and median follow-up was 73 months. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition was used to define BF. Kaplan-Meier calculations were from the start of radiotherapy. Cox proportional hazards regression multivariate analyses were used to investigate the association of BF (time-dependent variable) and other factors to distant metastasis (DM), cause-specific death (CSD), and overall death (OD). The year of treatment was included in some of the multivariate analyses to correct for potential unknown factors that may have occurred during the years of the study, such as stage migration.
RESULTS: BF was observed in 316 patients (34%), and 66 (7%) experienced DM, 32 (3%) died of prostate cancer, and 230 (24%) died overall during the study period. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year rate estimates from the start of treatment for BF, DM, CSD, and OD were 38%, 6%, 3%, and 13%, respectively. All patients with DM had BF. In multivariate analyses, BF was associated with DM and CSD, but not OD. The inclusion of the year of treatment did not alter these relationships.
CONCLUSION: BF, as a time-dependent covariate, was the strongest determinant of DM and was also very significantly related to CSD. The inclusion of the year of treatment had little effect on these associations. Longer follow-up is needed to determine conclusively the relationship of BF to OD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12909210     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00538-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

Review 1.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prostate cancer: HIFU is effective, but associated morbidity still remains unclear.

Authors:  John F Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Radiation dose and late failures in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter B Morgan; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert G Uzzo; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Prostate-specific antigen nadir within 12 months of prostate cancer radiotherapy predicts metastasis and death.

Authors:  Pino Alcantara; Alexandra Hanlon; Mark K Buyyounouski; Eric M Horwitz; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  How can men destined for biochemical failure after androgen deprivation and radiotherapy be identified earlier?

Authors:  David J D'Ambrosio; Karen Ruth; Eric M Horwitz; Robert G Uzzo; Alan Pollack; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Gerald E Hanks; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Dose escalation using ultra-high dose IMRT in intermediate risk prostate cancer without androgen deprivation therapy: preliminary results of toxicity and biochemical control.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Petrongari; Valeria Landoni; Biancamaria Saracino; Sara Gomellini; Stefano Arcangeli; Giuseppe Iaccarino; Paola Pinnarò; Giorgio Arcangeli; Lidia Strigari
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-13

8.  Risk Stratification after Biochemical Failure following Curative Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Data from the TROG 96.01 Trial.

Authors:  Allison Steigler; James W Denham; David S Lamb; Nigel A Spry; David Joseph; John Matthews; Chris Atkinson; Sandra Turner; John North; David Christie; Keen-Hun Tai; Chris Wynne
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2012-12-24

9.  Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Keisuke Tsuchida; Koji Inaba; Tairo Kashihara; Naoya Murakami; Kae Okuma; Kana Takahashi; Hiroshi Igaki; Yuko Nakayama; Aiko Maejima; Yasuo Shinoda; Yoshiyuki Matsui; Motokiyo Komiyama; Hiroyuki Fujimoto; Yoshinori Ito; Minako Sumi; Takashi Nakano; Jun Itami
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.