Literature DB >> 12909183

Which clinical decisions benefit from automation? A task complexity approach.

Vitali Sintchenko1, Enrico W Coiera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a model for analysing complex medical decision making tasks and for evaluating their suitability for automation.
METHOD: Assessment of a decision task's complexity in terms of the number of elementary information processes (EIPs) and the potential for cognitive effort reduction through EIP minimisation using an automated decision aid.
RESULTS: The model consists of five steps: (1) selection of the domain and relevant tasks; (2) evaluation of the knowledge complexity for tasks selected; (3) identification of cognitively demanding tasks; (4) assessment of unaided and aided effort requirements for this task accomplishment; and (5) selection of computational tools to achieve this complexity reduction. The model is applied to the task of antibiotic prescribing in critical care and the most complex components of the task identified. Decision aids to support these components can provide a significant reduction of cognitive effort suggesting this is a decision task worth automating.
CONCLUSION: We view the role of decision support for complex decision to be one of task complexity reduction, and the model described allows for task automation without lowering decision quality and can assist decision support systems developers.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12909183     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00040-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  15 in total

1.  Cognitive analysis of decision support for antibiotic prescribing at the point of ordering in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Barbara Sheehan; David Kaufman; Peter Stetson; Leanne M Currie
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

2.  Decision complexity affects the extent and type of decision support use.

Authors:  Vitali Sintchenko; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

3.  Using computerized provider order entry and clinical decision support to improve referring physicians' implementation of consultants' medical recommendations.

Authors:  Martin C Were; Greg Abernathy; Siu L Hui; Carol Kempf; Michael Weiner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Is relevance relevant? User relevance ratings may not predict the impact of Internet search on decision outcomes.

Authors:  Enrico W Coiera; Victor Vickland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Heuristics in Managing Complex Clinical Decision Tasks in Experts' Decision Making.

Authors:  Roosan Islam; Charlene Weir; Guilherme Del Fiol
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  The role of computerized decision support in reducing errors in selecting medicines for prescription: narrative review.

Authors:  Melissa T Baysari; Johanna Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Richard O Day
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Automating Clinical Score Calculation within the Electronic Health Record. A Feasibility Assessment.

Authors:  Christopher Aakre; Mikhail Dziadzko; Mark T Keegan; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  The cognitive aids in medicine assessment tool (CMAT) applied to five neonatal resuscitation algorithms.

Authors:  M L McLanders; S D Marshall; P M Sanderson; H G Liley
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  A New Informatics Geography.

Authors:  E Coiera
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

10.  Support for contextual control in primary care: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Charlene Weir; Frank A Drews; Jorie Butler; Robyn J Barrus; Mokoto L Jones; Jonathan R Nebeker
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.