Literature DB >> 12908644

Relationship between self-report and clinician-rated impairment in depressed outpatients.

Teresa L Kramer1, Richard R Owen, Crystal Wilson, Carol R Thrush.   

Abstract

This study examined the potential of using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale as a valid measure of patient-reported status and predictor of three-month outcomes for 59 patients seeking outpatient treatment for depression. A moderate relationship between the GAF and patient report at baseline and follow-up suggests it may be clinically useful for routine monitoring of depressed patients.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12908644     DOI： 10.1023/a:1024068007558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Ment Health J        ISSN： 0010-3853


  15 in total

1.  A comparison of psychiatrists' clinical-impression-based and social workers' computer-generated GAF scores.

Authors:  Tamar Zohar Harel; Donald W Smith; J Mark Rowles
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Interrater reliability issues in multicenter trials, Part II: Statistical procedures used in Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #394.

Authors:  R Edson; P Lavori; K Tracy; L A Adler; J Rotrosen
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1997

Review 3.  Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.

Authors:  H H Goldman; A E Skodol; T R Lave
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  The changing face of mental health managed care.

Authors:  D Mechanic
Journal:  New Dir Ment Health Serv       Date:  1998

5.  Measuring the outcomes of care for mental health problems. The case of depressive disorders.

Authors:  K Rost; G R Smith; M A Burnam; B J Burns
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).

Authors:  S H Jones; G Thornicroft; M Coffey; G Dunn
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Validity of the Depression-Arkansas (D-ARK) Scale: a tool for measuring major depressive disorder.

Authors:  G Richard Smith; Teresa L Kramer; Jan A Hollenberg; Cindy L Mosley; Robin L Ross; Audrey Burnam
Journal:  Ment Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-09

8.  Comparison of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in elderly depressed patients.

Authors:  N Mittmann; N Herrmann; K I Shulman; I Silver; N Shear; C A Naranjo
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.485

9.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; J F Lu; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983
View more
  2 in total

1.  Field test of the feasibility and validity of using the Hoosier Assurance Plan Instrument for Adults in a state mental health program.

Authors:  Frederick L Newman; John McGrew; Richard N Deliberty
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-06-24

2.  The impact of waiting time on patient outcomes: Evidence from early intervention in psychosis services in England.

Authors:  Anika Reichert; Rowena Jacobs
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.046
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.