Literature DB >> 12905552

Colonic anastomotic strength and matrix metalloproteinase activity in an experimental model of bacterial peritonitis.

I H J T de Hingh1, B M de Man, R M L M Lomme, H van Goor, T Hendriks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies report conflicting results on the safety of primary intestinal anastomoses in the presence of peritonitis, and comprehensive experimental data are lacking. The present study investigated whether the strength of experimental colonic anastomoses is affected if surgery is performed in the presence of pre-existing bacterial peritonitis.
METHODS: Colonic anastomoses were constructed in Wistar rats 24 h after caecal ligation and puncture or a sham procedure. Anastomotic strength was assessed by measuring breaking strength and bursting pressure during the first 5 days after operation. Anastomotic hydroxyproline levels were measured and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity was analysed by quantitative gelatin zymography.
RESULTS: Anastomotic strength was lowered in the presence of bacterial peritonitis but in a minor and transient way. The breaking strength was lower only immediately after construction of the anastomosis (- 15 per cent, P = 0.011) and the bursting pressure only on the third postoperative day (- 33 per cent, P = 0.038); no anastomotic dehiscence was observed. At 3 days after operation increased levels of MMP activity were observed but anastomotic hydroxyproline content was not affected by bacterial peritonitis.
CONCLUSION: The influence of bacterial peritonitis on the development of anastomotic strength is limited. This experimental finding lends support to recent clinical studies that have demonstrated the feasibility of constructing a primary anastomosis under these conditions. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12905552     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  17 in total

Review 1.  Compression anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a review.

Authors:  A P Zbar; Y Nir; A Weizman; M Rabau; A Senagore
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Yik Hong Ho; Mohamed Ahmed Tawfik Ashour
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Circular anastomotic experimental fibrin sealant protection in deep colorectal anastomosis in pigs in a randomized 9-day survival study.

Authors:  F A Wenger; E Szucsik; B F Hoinoiu; A M Cimpean; M Ionac; M Raica
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Staple line/anastomotic reinforcement and other adjuncts: do they make a difference?

Authors:  Richard Betzold; Jonathan A Laryea
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

5.  The prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage with tissue adhesives in a contaminated environment is associated with the presence of anti-inflammatory macrophages.

Authors:  Zhouqiao Wu; Konstantinos A Vakalopoulos; Geesien S A Boersema; Leonard F Kroese; King H Lam; Paul H van der Horst; Irene M Mulder; Yvonne M Bastiaansen-Jenniskens; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Effect of omiganan on colonic anastomosis healing in a rat model of peritonitis.

Authors:  Teresa Lorenzi; Maria Michela Cappelletti Trombettoni; Roberto Ghiselli; Francesca Paolinelli; Rosaria Gesuita; Oscar Cirioni; Mauro Provinciali; Wojciech Kamysz; Elzbieta Kamysz; Cristiano Piangatelli; Mario Castellucci; Mario Guerrieri; Manrico Morroni
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) decrease postoperative adhesions by increasing peritoneal fibrinolytic activity.

Authors:  Cary B Aarons; Philip A Cohen; Adam Gower; Karen L Reed; Susan E Leeman; Arthur F Stucchi; James M Becker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  No detrimental effects of repeated laparotomies on early healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses.

Authors:  I H J T de Hingh; H van Goor; B M de Man; R M L M Lomme; R P Bleichrodt; T Hendriks
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Effects of pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate on healing of colonic anastomoses in the cecal ligation and puncture model of intraperitoneal sepsis in rats.

Authors:  Zafer Teke; Faruk Onder Aytekin; Cagatay Aydin; Burhan Kabay; Cigdem Yenisey; Suzan Sacar; Nilufer Genc Simsek; Koray Tekin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Anastomoses of the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Govind Nandakumar; Sharon L Stein; Fabrizio Michelassi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.