Literature DB >> 12904967

The influence of changing nicotine to tar ratios on human puffing behaviour and perceived sensory response.

Michael Dixon1, Neena Kochhar, Krishna Prasad, Jim Shepperd, David M Warburton.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Smokers modify their smoking behaviour when switching from their usual product to higher or lower tar and nicotine-yield cigarettes.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of the current study were to assess the influence of varying nicotine yields at constant tar yield on human puffing measures, nicotine deliveries under human smoking conditions and the sensory response to mainstream cigarette smoke. These assessments would allow an evaluation of the degree of compensation and the various possible causes of changes, if any.
METHODS: The participants were 13 regular smokers of commercial or hand-rolled cigarettes. They were tested with four cigarettes, which exhibited a wide range of nicotine to "tar" ratios at a relatively constant "tar" yield. Their smoking behaviour was monitored by placing the test cigarettes into an orifice-type holder/flowmeter attached to a custom-built smoker behaviour analyser. In addition, a comprehensive sensory evaluation of the products was carried out.
RESULTS: The differences in the nicotine to tar ratios of the samples did not significantly influence the puffing behaviour patterns, i.e. puff number and interval, total and average puff volume, integrated pressure and puff duration. Additionally the pre- to post-exhaled CO boosts were not significantly influenced by the experimental samples used in the study. However, the nicotine yields obtained by the smokers were significantly influenced by the machine-smoked nicotine yields or the nicotine to tar ratios of the samples. The machine-smoked nicotine yields were highly correlated with the nicotine yields obtained under human smoking conditions. For the sensory evaluation, there was only a significant difference between the samples in the intensity of the impact.
CONCLUSION: These observations imply that these puffing variables are not controlled by the nicotine yield of the cigarette.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904967     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1541-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  25 in total

Review 1.  Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  G Scherer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  A consideration of the role of gas/particle partitioning in the deposition of nicotine and other tobacco smoke compounds in the respiratory tract.

Authors:  J F Pankow
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Changes in laryngeal calibre due to inhalation of dust.

Authors:  M Dixon; P Richardson; A Stransky; M Szereda-Przestaszewska; J G Widdicombe
Journal:  Rev Inst Hyg Mines (Hasselt)       Date:  1974

4.  Switching to ultralow nicotine cigarettes: effects of different tar yields and blocking of olfactory cues.

Authors:  B Baldinger; M Hasenfratz; K Bättig
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Puff volume increases when low-nicotine cigarettes are smoked.

Authors:  R I Herning; R T Jones; J Bachman; A H Mines
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-07-18

6.  Does cigarette nicotine yield affect puff volume?

Authors:  S W Gust; R W Pickens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Pattern of inhalation of tobacco smoke in pipe, cigarette, and never smokers.

Authors:  D O Rodenstein; D C Stănescu
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1985-09

8.  Nicotine or tar titration in cigarette smoking behavior?

Authors:  M Hasenfratz; B Baldinger; K Bättig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Blockade of smoking satisfaction using the peripheral nicotinic antagonist trimethaphan.

Authors:  J E Rose; E C Westman; F M Behm; M P Johnson; J S Goldberg
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 10.  Nicotine and the smoker.

Authors:  D M Warburton
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.458

View more
  3 in total

1.  Behavioral filter vent blocking on the first cigarette of the day predicts which smokers of light cigarettes will increase smoke exposure from blocked vents.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Kathy Z Tang; Paul M Sanborn; Jon Y Zhou; Lynn T Kozlowski
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Characteristic Human Individual Puffing Profiles Can Generate More TNCO than ISO and Health Canada Regimes on Smoking Machine When the Same Brand Is Smoked.

Authors:  Charlotte G G M Pauwels; Agnes W Boots; Wouter F Visser; Jeroen L A Pennings; Reinskje Talhout; Frederik-Jan Van Schooten; Antoon Opperhuizen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Differences in vaping topography in relation to adherence to exclusive electronic cigarette use in veterans.

Authors:  Andrea Guerrero-Cignarella; Landy V Luna Diaz; Kira Balestrini; Gregory Holt; Mehdi Mirsaeidi; Rafael Calderon-Candelario; Philip Whitney; Matthias Salathe; Michael A Campos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.