Literature DB >> 12904934

Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons.

Vijaya Krishnamoorthy1, Mark L Latash, John P Scholz, Vladimir M Zatsiorsky.   

Abstract

Movements by a standing person are commonly associated with adjustments in the activity of postural muscles to cause a desired shift of the center of pressure (COP) and keep balance. We hypothesize that such COP shifts are controlled (stabilized) using a small set of central variables (muscle modes, M-modes), while each M-mode induces changes in the activity of a subgroup of postural muscles. The main purpose of this study has been to explore the possibility of identification of muscle synergies in a postural task using the framework of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis employing the following three steps in data analysis: (i) Identification of M-modes: Subjects were asked to release a load from extended arms through a pulley system, resulting in a COP shift forward prior to load release. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of eleven postural muscles on one side of the body was integrated over a 100 ms interval corresponding to the early stage of the COP shift, and subjected to a principal component (PC) analysis across multiple repetitions of each task. Three PCs were identified and associated with a 'push-back M-mode', a 'push-forward M-mode' and a 'mixed M-mode'. (ii) Calculation of the Jacobian of the system, which relates changes in the magnitude of M-modes to COP shifts using regression techniques: Subjects performed three different tasks (releasing different loads at the back, voluntarily shifting body weight forward and backward, at different speeds) to verify if the relationship between magnitudes of M-modes and COP shifts is task or direction specific. (iii) UCM analysis: Three tasks were chosen (load release in the front, arm movement forward and backward) which were associated with an early shift in COP. A manifold was identified in the M-mode space corresponding to a certain average (across trials) shift of the COP and variance per degree of freedom within the UCM (V(UCM)) and orthogonal (V(ORT)) to the UCM was computed. Across subjects, V(UCM) was significantly higher than V(ORT) when analysis at the third step was performed using a Jacobian computed based on a set of tasks associated with a COP shift in the same direction but not in the opposite direction. This result confirms our hypothesis that the M-modes work together as a synergy to stabilize a desired shift of the COP. Forward and backward COP shifts are associated with different synergies based on the same three M-modes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904934     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1574-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task.

Authors:  J P Scholz; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Identification of neuromuscular synergies in natural upper-arm movements.

Authors:  Angelo M Sabatini
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling.

Authors:  V M Zatsiorsky; Z M Li; M L Latash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Is the center of gravity controlled during upper trunk movements?

Authors:  S Vernazza; A Alexandrov; J Massion
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of stretch and vestibulo-spinal reflexes in the generation of human equilibrating reactions.

Authors:  J H Allum; F Honegger; C R Pfaltz
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss.

Authors:  F B Horak; L M Nashner; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A new look at posturographic analysis in the clinical context: sway-density versus other parameterization techniques.

Authors:  Luigi Baratto; Pietro G Morasso; Cristina Re; Gino Spada
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.422

9.  Forward and backward axial synergies in man.

Authors:  P Crenna; C Frigo; J Massion; A Pedotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Synergies and strategies underlying normal and vestibulary deficient control of balance: implication for neuroprosthetic control.

Authors:  J H Allum; F Honegger
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  106 in total

1.  Finger interaction during accurate multi-finger force production tasks in young and elderly persons.

Authors:  Minoru Shinohara; John P Scholz; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Muscle modes during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: effect of instability and additional support.

Authors:  Vijaya Krishnamoorthy; Mark L Latash; John P Scholz; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Task-level feedback can explain temporal recruitment of spatially fixed muscle synergies throughout postural perturbations.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Optimality vs. variability: an example of multi-finger redundant tasks.

Authors:  Jaebum Park; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Robustness of muscle synergies underlying three-dimensional force generation at the hand in healthy humans.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; William Z Rymer; Randall F Beer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and principle of superposition during static prehension in three dimensions.

Authors:  Jae Kun Shim; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Joint coordination during quiet stance: effects of vision.

Authors:  Vijaya Krishnamoorthy; Jeng-Feng Yang; John P Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Muscle synergies involved in shifting the center of pressure while making a first step.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Jeng-Feng Yang; John P Scholz; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke.

Authors:  David J Clark; Lena H Ting; Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.