Literature DB >> 12904631

Prediction of 200-m sprint kayaking performance.

Ken A van Someren1, Garry S Palmer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the anthropometric and physiological profile of 200-m sprint kayakers and to examine relationships with 200-m race performance. Twenty-six male kayakers who were categorised in two ability groups, international (Int) and national (Nat) level, underwent a battery of anthropometric and physiological tests and a 200-m race. Race time was significantly lower in Int than Nat (39.9 +/- 0.8 s and 42.6 +/- 0.9 s, respectively). Int demonstrated significantly greater measures of mesomorphy, biepycondylar humeral breadth, circumferences of the upper arm, forearm and chest, peak power and total work in a modified Wingate test, total work in a 2-min ergometry test, peak isokinetic power, and peak isometric force. Significant relationships were found between 200-m time and a number of anthropometric variables and anaerobic and dynamometric parameters. Stepwise multiple regression revealed that total work in the modified Wingate alone predicted 200-m race time (R2 = 0.53, SEE = 1.11 s) for all 26 subjects, while biepycondylar humeral breadth alone predicted race time (R2 = 0.54, SEE = 0.52 s) in Int. These results demonstrate that superior upper body dimensions and anaerobic capacities distinguish international-level kayakers from national-level athletes and may be used to predict 200-m performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904631     DOI: 10.1139/h03-039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1066-7814


  11 in total

1.  Cross-validation of the 20- versus 30-s Wingate anaerobic test.

Authors:  C Matthew Laurent; Michael C Meyers; Clay A Robinson; J Matt Green
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Differences in Anthropometry, Biological Age and Physical Fitness Between Young Elite Kayakers and Canoeists.

Authors:  Daniel López-Plaza; Fernando Alacid; José María Muyor; Pedro Ángel López-Miñarro
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 3.  The Relationship between Isometric Force-Time Characteristics and Dynamic Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Danny Lum; G Gregory Haff; Tiago M Barbosa
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 4.  Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects.

Authors:  Jules A A C Heuberger; Adam F Cohen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Prediction of Simulated 1,000 m Kayak Ergometer Performance in Young Athletes.

Authors:  André B Coelho; Fábio Y Nakamura; Micaela C Morgado; Francisco Alves; Angela Di Baldassarre; Andrew Flatt; Luis Rama
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20

6.  Effect of a 3-Weeks Training Camp on Muscle Oxygenation, V ˙ O2 and Performance in Elite Sprint Kayakers.

Authors:  Myriam Paquette; François Bieuzen; François Billaut
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-04-28

7.  Magnitude and Shape of the Forces Applied on the Foot Rest and Paddle by Elite Kayakers.

Authors:  Pedro Bonito; Miguel Sousa; Fernando José Ferreira; Jorge Fonseca Justo; Beatriz Branquinho Gomes
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Validity of Performance Assessment Methods in Elite Paracanoeists.

Authors:  Michal Starczewski; Piotr Zmijewski; Andrzej Klusiewicz
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Relationship between performance test and body composition/physical strength characteristic in sprint canoe and kayak paddlers.

Authors:  Saki Hamano; Eisuke Ochi; Yosuke Tsuchiya; Erina Muramatsu; Kazuhiro Suzukawa; Shoji Igawa
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-19

10.  Association of Anthropometrics and Body Composition with Maximal and Relative Force and Power of Kayak Stroke in Competitive Kayak Athletes.

Authors:  Filip Kukić; Miloš Petrović; Gianpiero Greco; Stefania Cataldi; Francesco Fischetti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.