Literature DB >> 12904486

Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations.

Christine Tong1, J Randall Flanagan.   

Abstract

Numerous studies of motor learning have focused on how people adapt their reaching movements to novel dynamic and visuomotor perturbations that alter the actual or visually perceived motion of the hand. An important finding from this work is that learning of novel dynamics generalizes across different movement tasks. Thus adaptation to an unusual force field generalizes from center-out reaching movements to circular movements (Conditt et al. 1997). This suggests that subjects acquired an internal model of the dynamic environment that could be used to determine the motor commands needed for untrained movements. Using a task interference paradigm, we investigated whether transfer across tasks is also observed when learning visuomotor transformations. On day 1, all subjects adapted to a +30 degrees rotation while making center-out-and-back reaching movements. After a delay of 5 min, different groups of subjects then adapted to a -30 degrees rotation while performing either a continuous tracking task, a figure-eight drawing task, or the center-out-and-back reaching task. All subjects were then retested the next day on the +30 degrees rotation in the reaching task. As expected, subjects who experienced the opposing rotations while performing the same reaching tasks showed no retention of learning for the first rotation when tested on day 2 (Krakauer et al. 1999). In contrast, such retrograde interference was not observed in the two groups of subjects who experienced the opposing rotations while performing different tasks. In fact, their performance on day 2 was similar to that of control subjects who never experienced the opposite rotation. This lack of interference suggests that memory resources for visuomotor rotations are task specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904486     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01087.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  25 in total

1.  Environmental experience within and across testing days determines the strength of human visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Amy L Daitch; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Asymmetric transfer of visuomotor learning between discrete and rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ikegami; Masaya Hirashima; Gentaro Taga; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The effectiveness of robotic training depends on motor task characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Nicole Rappo; Robert Riener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations.

Authors:  Jessica Klassen; Christine Tong; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Surface electrical stimulation perturbation context determines the presence of error reduction in swallowing hyolaryngeal kinematics.

Authors:  Ianessa A Humbert; Heather Christopherson; Akshay Lokhande
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Long-lasting modifications of saccadic eye movements following adaptation induced in the double-step target paradigm.

Authors:  Nadia Alahyane; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sung-Phil Kim; John D Simeral; Leigh R Hochberg; John P Donoghue; Michael J Black
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Consensus: "Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?"

Authors:  Janine Reis; Edwin Robertson; John W Krakauer; John Rothwell; Lisa Marshall; Christian Gerloff; Eric Wassermann; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo A Celnik; Joseph Classen; Agnes Floel; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus; Hartwig R Siebner; Jan Born; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Adaptive changes in automatic motor responses based on acquired visuomotor correspondence.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Itaguchi; Kazuyoshi Fukuzawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.