A Peccio1, T Autio, H Korkeala, R Rosmini, M Trevisani. 1. Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria e Patologia Animale, Facoltà di Medicina Veterinaria, Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
AIMS: The prevalence, level of contamination and epidemiological profile of Listeria monocytogenes were investigated in two meat-producing plants during a 20-month period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sampling for L. monocytogenes was carried out in a cattle slaughterhouse (n = 72) and a swine meat-processing plant (n = 68) during a 20-month period. Swabs and food samples were analysed with the most probable number (MPN) technique for L. monocytogenes and the isolated strains were characterized by AscI-restriction analysis pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (REA-PFGE). Contamination of meat and meat products was always at low level (below 50 MPN per gram). The seven L. monocytogenes positive samples isolated in the bovine slaughterhouse yielded strains with the same REA-PFGE profile. However, the seven strains isolated in the swine meat processing plant showed six different profiles. Two of them showed indistinguishable profiles with L. monocytogenes strains collected from other meat processing facilities located in the same area. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The genotyping method is a valuable tool to investigate contamination sources. The study of REA-PFGE profiles indicated that environmental contamination was probably responsible for the persistence of over 16 months of one strain of L. monocytogenes in the cattle slaughterhouse. Several meat suppliers could be responsible for the contamination in the pig meat processing facility, and this is confirmed by the finding of some identical strain in other meat processing facilities located in the same area.
AIMS: The prevalence, level of contamination and epidemiological profile of Listeria monocytogenes were investigated in two meat-producing plants during a 20-month period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sampling for L. monocytogenes was carried out in a cattle slaughterhouse (n = 72) and a swine meat-processing plant (n = 68) during a 20-month period. Swabs and food samples were analysed with the most probable number (MPN) technique for L. monocytogenes and the isolated strains were characterized by AscI-restriction analysis pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (REA-PFGE). Contamination of meat and meat products was always at low level (below 50 MPN per gram). The seven L. monocytogenes positive samples isolated in the bovine slaughterhouse yielded strains with the same REA-PFGE profile. However, the seven strains isolated in the swine meat processing plant showed six different profiles. Two of them showed indistinguishable profiles with L. monocytogenes strains collected from other meat processing facilities located in the same area. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The genotyping method is a valuable tool to investigate contamination sources. The study of REA-PFGE profiles indicated that environmental contamination was probably responsible for the persistence of over 16 months of one strain of L. monocytogenes in the cattle slaughterhouse. Several meat suppliers could be responsible for the contamination in the pig meat processing facility, and this is confirmed by the finding of some identical strain in other meat processing facilities located in the same area.
Authors: David Rodríguez-Lázaro; Anna Jofré; Teresa Aymerich; Marta Hugas; Maria Pla Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Elena Dalzini; Elena Cosciani-Cunico; Enrico Pavoni; Barbara Bertasi; Paolo Daminelli; Guido Finazzi; Marina N Losio; Giorgio Varisco Journal: Ital J Food Saf Date: 2014-02-27
Authors: Giuliana Siddi; Francesca Piras; Vincenzo Spanu; Maria Pina Meloni; Rita Sanna; Nadia Carta; Marco Errico; Mario Cuccu; Enrico Pietro Luigi De Santis; Christian Scarano Journal: Ital J Food Saf Date: 2022-06-27
Authors: C D Cruz; F A Silvestre; E M Kinoshita; M Landgraf; B D G M Franco; M T Destro Journal: Braz J Microbiol Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 2.476
Authors: Roberta A Bento; Tânia L M Stamford; Galba M de Campos-Takaki; Thayza C M Stamford; Evandro L de Souza Journal: Braz J Microbiol Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 2.476
Authors: Rached Ismaïl; Florence Aviat; Valérie Michel; Isabelle Le Bayon; Perrine Gay-Perret; Magdalena Kutnik; Michel Fédérighi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 3.390