Literature DB >> 12900204

Simulation of circadian rhythm generation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus with locally coupled self-sustained oscillators.

Hanspeter Kunz1, Peter Achermann.   

Abstract

In mammals, circadian rhythms are driven by a pacemaker located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the anterior hypothalamus. The firing rate of neurons within the SCN exhibits a circadian rhythm. There is evidence that individual neurons within the SCN act as circadian oscillators. Rhythm generation in the SCN was therefore modeled by a system of self-sustained oscillators. The model is composed of up to 10000 oscillatory elements arranged in a square array. Each oscillator has its own (randomly determined) intrinsic period reflecting the widely dispersed periods observed in the SCN. The model behavior was investigated mainly in the absence of synchronizing zeitgebers. Due to local coupling the oscillators synchronized and an overall rhythm emerged. This indicates that a locally coupled system is capable of integrating the output of individual clock cells with widely dispersed periods. The period of the global output (average of all oscillators) corresponded to the average of the intrinsic periods and was stable even for small amplitudes and during transients. Noise, reflecting biological fluctuations at the cellular level, distorted the global rhythm in small arrays. The period of the rhythm could be stabilized by increasing the array size, which thus increased the robustness against noise. Since different regions of the SCN have separate output pathways, the array of oscillators was subdivided into four quadrants. Sudden deviations of periodicity sometimes appeared in one quadrant, while the periods of the other quadrants were largely unaffected. This result could represent a model for splitting, which has been observed in animal experiments. In summary, the multi-oscillator model of the SCN showed a broad repertoire of dynamic patterns, revealed a stable period (even during transients) with robustness against noise, and was able to account for such a complex physiological behavior as splitting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12900204     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00141-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  25 in total

1.  Spontaneous synchronization of coupled circadian oscillators.

Authors:  Didier Gonze; Samuel Bernard; Christian Waltermann; Achim Kramer; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Design principles for phase-splitting behaviour of coupled cellular oscillators: clues from hamsters with 'split' circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Premananda Indic; William J Schwartz; David Paydarfar
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Exploring spatiotemporal organization of SCN circuits.

Authors:  L Yan; I Karatsoreos; J Lesauter; D K Welsh; S Kay; D Foley; R Silver
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2007

4.  Distinct roles for GABA across multiple timescales in mammalian circadian timekeeping.

Authors:  Daniel DeWoskin; Jihwan Myung; Mino D C Belle; Hugh D Piggins; Toru Takumi; Daniel B Forger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multicellular model for intercellular synchronization in circadian neural networks.

Authors:  Christina Vasalou; Erik D Herzog; Michael A Henson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Dynamic interactions between coupled oscillators within the hamster circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  Jennifer A Evans; Jeffrey A Elliott; Michael R Gorman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Emergence of noise-induced oscillations in the central circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  Caroline H Ko; Yujiro R Yamada; David K Welsh; Ethan D Buhr; Andrew C Liu; Eric E Zhang; Martin R Ralph; Steve A Kay; Daniel B Forger; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Modeling feedback loops of the Mammalian circadian oscillator.

Authors:  Sabine Becker-Weimann; Jana Wolf; Hanspeter Herzel; Achim Kramer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  A molecular model for intercellular synchronization in the mammalian circadian clock.

Authors:  Tsz-Leung To; Michael A Henson; Erik D Herzog; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Dim nocturnal illumination alters coupling of circadian pacemakers in Siberian hamsters, Phodopus sungorus.

Authors:  M R Gorman; J A Elliott
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.