Literature DB >> 12899498

Psychosocial issues in cancer genetics--current status and future directions.

Eveline M A Bleiker1, Daniela E E Hahn, Neil K Aaronson.   

Abstract

Diagnostic tests are now available that allow genetic testing for several types of cancer. The aim of genetic counseling and testing for cancer is to educate individuals about cancer risk and cancer prevention, which it is hoped will lead to a reduction in morbidity and mortality. However, at this relatively early stage in the development of genetic counseling and testing programs, information is needed on the psychosocial impact of such programs on both the individual counselee and his/her family. This paper reviews the findings obtained during the past decade on the uptake of genetic testing, reasons for undergoing genetic testing, and the impact of genetic counseling and testing on feelings of distress and guilt. Specific attention is paid to experiences with prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy and the effectiveness of the uptake of and satisfaction with these risk-reducing procedures. In addition, the possible impact of genetic testing on insurance, work and future plans is discussed. Suggestions are given for translating research findings into psychosocial services and future research efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12899498     DOI: 10.1080/02841860310004391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Barriers to and motivations for physician referral of patients to cancer genetics clinics.

Authors:  Carrie F Prochniak; Lisa J Martin; Erin M Miller; Sara C Knapke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Validation of a self-concept scale for Lynch syndrome in different nationalities.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Katarina Domanska; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Jiahui Wong; Christina Carlsson; Inge Bernstein; Mary Jane Esplen; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure.

Authors:  E Claes; G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; M Decruyenaere; A Boogaerts; K Philippe; E Legius
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; James Janisse; Robin Gold; Michelle Cichon; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Hopefulness predicts resilience after hereditary colorectal cancer genetic testing: a prospective outcome trajectories study.

Authors:  Samuel M Y Ho; Judy W C Ho; George A Bonanno; Annie T W Chu; Emily M S Chan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Gregory R Harper; Lois C Friedman; Wendy S Rubinstein; David T Mauger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Distress and family functioning in oncogenetic counselling for hereditary and familial breast and/or ovarian cancers.

Authors:  C Condello; R Gesuita; M Pensabene; I Spagnoletti; I Capuano; C Baldi; F Carle; A Contegiacomo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.