Literature DB >> 12899233

The utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prostheses.

Brent K Hollenbeck1, David C Miller, Dana A Ohl.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Autoinflation is a troublesome complication following penile prosthesis placement that may be potentiated by prevesical scarring following radical prostatectomy. We evaluated the frequency of autoinflation and other complications following penile prosthesis placement in radical prostatectomy patients and controls as a surrogate to establishing the utility of lockout reservoirs in preventing autoinflation.
METHODS: 139 prostheses (including 14 with lockout reservoirs) were placed in 132 men (including 35 post-prostatectomy patients) over a 5(1/2) year period at our institution. Outcomes assessed include postoperative complications and the need for revision or replacement of the prosthesis. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine the association of patient, device-specific, and perioperative characteristics with these outcomes.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the postoperative complication and re-operation rates between post-prostatectomy patients and controls (both p > 0.77). The incidence of autoinflation in post-prostatectomy patients and controls was 3% and 5%, respectively (p > 0.99). Patients with prior prostheses were 3 times as likely to develop a postoperative complication or require prosthesis revision (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Penile prostheses are well tolerated in post-prostatectomy patients with comparable outcomes to those men with organic erectile dysfunction. The frequency of autoinflation does not appear to be increased in post-prostatectomy patients. Initial results with the lockout valve reservoir in preventing autoinflation are encouraging though additional study is warranted to justify their routine use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12899233     DOI: 10.1023/a:1024439705539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  13 in total

1.  Patient and partner satisfaction with the AMS 700 penile prosthesis.

Authors:  R H McLaren; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Back-pressure testing to prevent autoinflation of penile prosthetic devices.

Authors:  F E Govier; R D McClure; R M Weissman; D Kramer-Levien
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  D K Montague; K W Angermeier
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis.

Authors:  F B Scott; W E Bradley; G W Timm
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group.

Authors:  C C Carson; J J Mulcahy; F E Govier
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Outpatient inflatable penile prosthesis insertion.

Authors:  B B Garber
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Assessment of psychosexual adjustment after insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  M V Tefilli; F Dubocq; A Rajpurkar; E L Gheiler; R Tiguert; C Barton; H Li; C B Dhabuwala
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Penile prosthesis in the organ transplant recipient.

Authors:  D C Cuellar; G N Sklar
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  F E Govier; R P Gibbons; R J Correa; T R Pritchett; D Kramer-Levien
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Mentor Alpha 1 inflatable penile prosthesis: patient satisfaction and device reliability.

Authors:  B B Garber
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  1 in total

1.  Counter incision is a safe and effective method for alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  Dominic Grimberg; Sabrina Wang; Evan Carlos; Brent Nosé; Shelby Harper; Aaron C Lentz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.