Literature DB >> 10893589

Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group.

C C Carson1, J J Mulcahy, F E Govier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a long-term multicenter study of the AMS 700CX 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis, focusing on longevity, morbidity and patient satisfaction in men implanted up to 134 months with a median followup of 47.7 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a large scale retrospective multicenter study in 2 phases. Phase 1 was a medical record review of 372 men who underwent implantation with the AMS 700CX penile prosthesis from 1987 to 1996 by 7 frequent penile prosthesis implanters. Phase 2 included a structured telephone interview of 207 patients by a neutral observer.
RESULTS: For the 372 men in phase 1 mean device mechanical reliability plus or minus standard deviation was 92.1% + or - 3.3% after 3 and 86.2% + or - 4.6% after 5 years. Patient age was 21 to 79 years (mean 57.6 + or - 11.0) at implantation. The etiology of erectile dysfunction was vascular in 27.7% of the cases, Peyronie's disease in 16.9%, diabetes mellitus in 12.9% and radical surgery in 11.6%. Of the men 55.6% received previous treatment for erectile dysfunction. Postoperative infection and device malfunction developed in 3.2% and 17.5% of the cases, respectively. Of the 207 men interviewed in phase 2, 86% still had an AMS 700CX penile prosthesis implanted, including 87.1% with erection suitable for coitus. Currently 79% of those with a device use it at least twice monthly and 88.2% would recommend an implant to a relative or friend.
CONCLUSIONS: The AMS 700CX penile implant produced suitable erection and excellent patient satisfaction at long-term followup in the majority of men. Implant reliability is excellent and postoperative morbidity is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10893589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  41 in total

Review 1.  Radiological assessment of penile prosthesis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ignacio Moncada; José Jara; Ramiro Cabello; Juan Ignacio Monzo; Carlos Hernández
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Penile prosthetic surgery and its role in the treatment of end-stage erectile dysfunction - an update.

Authors:  S Jain; T R Terry
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Penile implant infections: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Incarcerated inguinal hernia and small bowel obstruction as a rare complication of a penile prosthesis.

Authors:  S J Serio; P Schafer; A M Merchant
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Combination therapy for erectile dysfunction: an update review.

Authors:  Rohit R Dhir; Hao-Cheng Lin; Steven E Canfield; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

Review 7.  Minimizing Penile Implant Infection: A Literature Review of Patient and Surgical Factors.

Authors:  Bradley Holland; Tobias Kohler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient?

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Thiago Fernandes Negris Lima; Joshua Bitran; Fabio Stefano Frech; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

10.  [Prostate carcinoma and erectile dysfunction. Which therapy when?].

Authors:  H Sperling; J Noldus
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.