Literature DB >> 12898313

Effects of lumbar spinal fusion on the other lumbar intervertebral levels (three-dimensional finite element analysis).

Keisuke Goto1, Naoya Tajima, Etsuo Chosa, Koji Totoribe, Shinichiro Kubo, Hiroshi Kuroki, Takashi Arai.   

Abstract

The risk of accelerating the degeneration of adjacent disc levels after lumbar spinal fusion is a controversial issue. A finite element model consisting of L1 to L5 lumbar spines was used to assess the effect on adjacent disc level after lumbar spinal fusion. We compared intact, L4/5 posterior interbody fusion (PLF), and L4/5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) models. The loading conditions applied were compressive force, compressive force plus flexion moment, and compressive force plus extension moment. Evaluations were made for von Mises stress on each vertebral end-plate, Tresca stress of all the annulus fibrosus, and Tresca stress of the annulus fibrosus from the posterior surface of the disc to the neural foramen. As the result, the von Mises stress adjacent to the fusion level was higher than the other nonfusion levels; it was higher under conditions of flexion moment loading plus compression loading [112% (2.59 PMa) in the PLF model and 117% (2.72 Mpa) in the PLIF model] than in the intact model. The Tresca stress of all the annulus fibrosus adjacent to the fusion level was higher than that on other nonfusion intervertebral levels; it was higher under conditions of flexion moment loading plus compression loading [127% (0.57 PMa) in the PLF model and 209% (0.89 Mpa) in the PLIF model] than in the intact model. The Tresca stress of the annulus fibrosus from the posterior surface of the disc to the neural foramen adjacent to the fusion level was higher than that on other nonfusion intervertebral levels; and it was higher under conditions of flexion moment loading plus compression loading [107% (1.48 PMa) in the PLF model and 112% (1.54 Mpa) in the PLIF model] than in the intact model. These findings demonstrate that with lumbar fusion, stresses on the vertebral end-plate and the annulus fibrosus were high adjacent to the fusion level; furthermore, stresses were higher in the PLIF model than in the PLF model. These results suggested that lumbar spinal fusion might bring with it a risk of damage to the annulus fibrosus and the vertebral end-plate adjacent to the fusion level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898313     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-003-0675-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  17 in total

1.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical changes of the lumbar segment after total disc replacement : charite(r), prodisc(r) and maverick(r) using finite element model study.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Bi-O Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-06-30

3.  A prospective morphological study of facet joint integrity following intervertebral disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Hans Trouillier; P Kern; H J Refior; M Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Quantitative analysis in outcome assessment of instrumented lumbosacral arthrodesis.

Authors:  Sabina Champain; Christian Mazel; Anca Mitulescu; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration.

Authors:  Per Ekman; Hans Möller; Adel Shalabi; Yiang Xiao Yu; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Kwonsoo Chun; Inchul Yang; Namhoon Kim; Dosang Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-11-30

7.  A concise follow-up of a previous report: posterior reduction and anterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  M Spruit; J P W van Jonbergen; M de Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Adjacent segment degeneration and disease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preserving procedures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunpeng Ren; Yueming Song; Limin Liu; Youdi Xue
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-12

9.  Biomechanical effects of semi-constrained integrated artificial discs on zygapophysial joints of implanted lumbar segments.

Authors:  Sheng-Nai Zheng; Qing-Qiang Yao; Li-Ming Wang; Wen-Hao Hu; Bo Wei; Yan Xu; Dong-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Comparison of 2-Level Versus 1-Level Total Disc Replacement: Results From a Prospective FDA-Regulated Trial.

Authors:  Jack E Zigler; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.