Literature DB >> 12897475

Intraoperative spinal navigation.

Langston T Holly1, Kevin T Foley.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review article.
OBJECTIVES: To provide a detailed overview of current methods for intraoperative spinal navigation using image-guided surgical technology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The development of novel intraoperative navigational techniques has been an important advancement in the field of spine surgery. These techniques, commonly referred to as image-guided surgery (IGS), provide simultaneous, multiplanar views of spinal anatomy. They can be used for detailed preoperative planning and allow the spinal surgeon to track the position of surgical instruments in real time. IGS technology can increase the accuracy of spinal instrumentation procedures and improve patient safety.
METHODS: The relevant medical literature was reviewed, as was the authors' clinical and laboratory experience with intraoperative spinal navigation.
RESULTS: Image-guided spinal instrumentation procedures in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine have lower rates of screw misplacement than do those performed without image guidance. In a typical IGS spinal procedure, surgical instruments are tracked in the operating room, and their positions are superimposed onto preoperatively acquired computed tomography scans (CT-based image guidance) or intraoperatively acquired fluoroscopic images (virtual fluoroscopy). A new development, the combination of isocentric C-arm fluoroscopy with computer-assisted image guidance, allows the C-arm to create intraoperative CT images that can be used for image-guided navigation without the need for a surgeon-dependent registration step. Each of these technologies has distinct advantages and limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative spinal navigation has advanced rapidly in recent years, beneficially affecting a variety of surgical procedures. Future technological developments will widen its clinical application and minimize its shortcomings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12897475     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076899.78522.D9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  43 in total

1.  Pedicle screw placement accuracy in thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Riccardo Cecchinato; Zsolt Fekete; Alberto Lipari; Meinrad Fiechter; P Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  O-arm(®)-based spinal navigation and intraoperative 3D-imaging: first experiences.

Authors:  O Gonschorek; S Hauck; U Spiegl; T Weiß; R Pätzold; V Bühren
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  3D-based navigation in posterior stabilisations of the cervical and thoracic spine: problems and benefits. Results of 451 screws.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Katscher; A Franck; S Glasmacher; C Schmidt; T Blattert; C Josten
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Timo Stübig; Henning Windhagen; Christian Krettek; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Comparison of two novel fluoroscopy-based stereotactic methods for cervical pedicle screw placement and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Bach; L Audigé; R Bale; R Attal; M Blauth; F Magerl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Cervical pedicle screw instrumentation is more reliable with O-arm-based 3D navigation: analysis of cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy with O-arm-based 3D navigation.

Authors:  Sourabh Chachan; Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Wee Lim Loo; John Carson Allen; Dinesh Shree Kumar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Case report: osteoid osteoma of the C2 pedicle: surgical technique using a navigation system.

Authors:  Hideki Nagashima; Takako Nishi; Koji Yamane; Atsushi Tanida
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Thorsten Tjardes; Sven Shafizadeh; Dieter Rixen; Thomas Paffrath; Bertil Bouillon; Eva S Steinhausen; Holger Baethis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Intraoperative computed tomography guidance to confirm decompression following endoscopic endonasal approach for cervicomedullary compression.

Authors:  Abhiram Gande; Matthew J Tormenti; Maria Koutourousiou; Alessandro Paluzzi; Juan C Fernendez-Miranda; Carl H Snydermnan; Paul A Gardner
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-01-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.