Literature DB >> 12896984

Polar localization of CheA2 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides requires specific Che homologs.

Angela C Martin1, Usha Nair, Judith P Armitage, Janine R Maddock.   

Abstract

Rhodobacter sphaeroides is a motile bacterium that has multiple chemotaxis genes organized predominantly in three major operons (cheOp(1), cheOp(2), and cheOp(3)). The chemoreceptor proteins are clustered at two distinct locations, the cell poles and in one or more cytoplasmic clusters. One intriguing possibility is that the physically distinct chemoreceptor clusters are each composed of a defined subset of specific chemotaxis proteins, including the chemoreceptors themselves plus specific CheW and CheA proteins. Here we report the subcellular localization of one such protein, CheA(2), under aerobic and photoheterotrophic growth conditions. CheA(2) is predominantly clustered and localized at the cell poles under both growth conditions. Furthermore, its localization is dependent upon one or more genes in cheOp(2) but not those of cheOp(1) or cheOp(3). In E. coli, the polar localization of CheA depends upon CheW. The R. sphaeroides cheOp(2) contains two cheW genes. Interestingly, CheW(2) is required under both aerobic and photoheterotrophic conditions, whereas CheW(3) is not required under aerobic conditions but appears to play a modest role under photoheterotrophic conditions. This suggests that R. sphaeroides contains at least two distinct chemotaxis complexes, possibly composed of proteins dedicated for each subcellular location. Furthermore, the composition of these spatially distinct complexes may change under different growth conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12896984      PMCID: PMC166465          DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.16.4667-4671.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  23 in total

Review 1.  How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation.

Authors:  A Bren; M Eisenbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Evolutionary conservation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein location in Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  J E Gestwicki; A C Lamanna; R M Harshey; L L McCarter; L L Kiessling; J Adler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Molecular information processing: lessons from bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret; Ann M Stock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-01-04       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Inter-receptor communication through arrays of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  Jason E Gestwicki; Laura L Kiessling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Dynamic and clustering model of bacterial chemotaxis receptors: structural basis for signaling and high sensitivity.

Authors:  Sung-Hou Kim; Weiru Wang; Kyeong Kyu Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A requirement for sodium in the growth of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides.

Authors:  W R SISTROM
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1960-06

7.  The roles of the multiple CheW and CheA homologues in chemotaxis and in chemoreceptor localization in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  A C Martin; G H Wadhams; J P Armitage
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  CheR- and CheB-dependent chemosensory adaptation system of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  A C Martin; G H Wadhams; D S Shah; S L Porter; J C Mantotta; T J Craig; P H Verdult; H Jones; J P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Differences in the polar clustering of the high- and low-abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S R Lybarger; J R Maddock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Fine tuning bacterial chemotaxis: analysis of Rhodobacter sphaeroides behaviour under aerobic and anaerobic conditions by mutation of the major chemotaxis operons and cheY genes.

Authors:  D S Shah; S L Porter; A C Martin; P A Hamblin; J P Armitage
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of aerobic and photosynthetic Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 proteomes.

Authors:  Stephen J Callister; Carrie D Nicora; Xiaohua Zeng; Jung Hyeob Roh; Miguel A Dominguez; Christine L Tavano; Matthew E Monroe; Samuel Kaplan; Timothy J Donohue; Richard D Smith; Mary S Lipton
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  Two chemosensory operons of Rhodobacter sphaeroides are regulated independently by sigma 28 and sigma 54.

Authors:  Angela C Martin; Marcus Gould; Elaine Byles; Mark A J Roberts; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Localization of SpoVAD to the inner membrane of spores of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Venkata Ramana Vepachedu; Peter Setlow
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Diversity in chemotaxis mechanisms among the bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Hendrik Szurmant; George W Ordal
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  A model invalidation-based approach for elucidating biological signalling pathways, applied to the chemotaxis pathway in R. sphaeroides.

Authors:  Mark A J Roberts; Elias August; Abdullah Hamadeh; Philip K Maini; Patrick E McSharry; Judith P Armitage; Antonis Papachristodoulou
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2009-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.