Literature DB >> 11442826

The roles of the multiple CheW and CheA homologues in chemotaxis and in chemoreceptor localization in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

A C Martin1, G H Wadhams, J P Armitage.   

Abstract

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has multiple homologues of most of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis genes, organized in two major operons and other, unlinked, loci. These include cheA1 and cheW1 (che Op1) and cheA2, cheW2 and cheW3 (che Op2). We have deleted each of these cheA and cheW homologues in-frame and examined the chemosensory behaviour of these strains on swarm plates and in tethered cell assays. In addition, we have examined the effect of these deletions on the polar localization of the chemoreceptor McpG. In E. coli, deletion of either cheA or cheW results in a non-chemotactic phenotype, and these strains also show no receptor clustering. Here, we demonstrate that CheW2 and CheA2 are required for the normal localization of McpG and for normal chemotactic responses under both aerobic and photoheterotrophic conditions. Under aerobic conditions, deletion of cheW3 has no significant effect on McpG localization and only has an effect on chemotaxis to shallow gradients in swarm plates. Under photoheterotrophic conditions, however, CheW3 is required for McpG localization and also for chemotaxis both on swarm plates and in the tethered cell assay. These phenotypes are not a direct result of delocalization of McpG, as this chemoreceptor does not mediate chemotaxis to any of the compounds tested and can therefore be considered a marker for general methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) clustering. Thus, there is a correlation between the normal localization of McpG (and presumably other chemoreceptors) and chemotaxis. We propose a model in which the multiple different MCPs in R. sphaeroides are contained within a polar chemoreceptor cluster. Deletion of cheW2 and cheA2 under both aerobic and photoheterotrophic conditions, and cheW3 under photoheterotrophic conditions, disrupts the cluster and hence reduces chemotaxis to any compound sensed by these MCPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11442826     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02468.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  30 in total

1.  Analyses of the roles of the three cheA homologs in chemotaxis of Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Khoosheh K Gosink; Reiji Kobayashi; Ikuro Kawagishi; Claudia C Häse
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  New motion analysis system for characterization of the chemosensory response kinetics of Rhodobacter sphaeroides under different growth conditions.

Authors:  Mila Kojadinovic; Antoine Sirinelli; George H Wadhams; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Construction of a genetic multiplexer to toggle between chemosensory pathways in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Tae Seok Moon; Elizabeth J Clarke; Eli S Groban; Alvin Tamsir; Ryan M Clark; Matthew Eames; Tanja Kortemme; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Polar localization of a soluble methyl-accepting protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Sonia L Bardy; Janine R Maddock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Unraveling the secret lives of bacteria: use of in vivo expression technology and differential fluorescence induction promoter traps as tools for exploring niche-specific gene expression.

Authors:  Hans Rediers; Paul B Rainey; Jos Vanderleyden; René De Mot
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Comparison of aerobic and photosynthetic Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 proteomes.

Authors:  Stephen J Callister; Carrie D Nicora; Xiaohua Zeng; Jung Hyeob Roh; Miguel A Dominguez; Christine L Tavano; Matthew E Monroe; Samuel Kaplan; Timothy J Donohue; Richard D Smith; Mary S Lipton
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.363

7.  The positioning of cytoplasmic protein clusters in bacteria.

Authors:  Stephen R Thompson; George H Wadhams; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Two chemosensory operons of Rhodobacter sphaeroides are regulated independently by sigma 28 and sigma 54.

Authors:  Angela C Martin; Marcus Gould; Elaine Byles; Mark A J Roberts; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 9.  Comparative genomic and protein sequence analyses of a complex system controlling bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Kristin Wuichet; Roger P Alexander; Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.600

10.  A minimal model for metabolism-dependent chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides (†).

Authors:  Sisi Fan; Robert G Endres
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.