Literature DB >> 12896895

Factors affecting the risk of blood bank specimen hemolysis.

Paula Tanabe1, Demetrios N Kyriacou, Franklyn Garland, Demetrious Kyriacou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate simultaneously several possible risk factors for blood bank specimen hemolysis.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of emergency department and labor and delivery patients to estimate the effect of various factors on the risk of blood bank specimen hemolysis. Study variables included patient demographics, type and gauge of needle or catheter, anatomic location of venipuncture, and patient care area. Hemolysis was determined by blood bank laboratory technicians. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression modeling was performed to estimate the adjusted relative risks for hemolysis.
RESULTS: Of the 605 subjects with complete data, 194 (32.1%) subjects had blood specimens drawn directly with a steel needle, and 411 (69.1%) had specimens drawn through a Vialon (BD Medical Systems, Inc., Sandy, UT) intravenous (IV) angiocatheter. The overall risk of hemolysis for all was 7%, 10% for Vialon IV angiocatheters and 1.5% for steel needles. In the multivariate analysis, the factors most closely associated with hemolysis were the use of Vialon IV catheters and sampling from an anatomic site other than the antecubital area.
CONCLUSIONS: Blood bank specimens drawn from Vialon IV catheters (particularly smaller gauge catheters) and from veins outside the antecubital area are at significantly increased risk to hemolyze.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12896895     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00637.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  3 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood sample hemolysis in EDs: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Heyer; James H Derzon; Linda Winges; Colleen Shaw; Diana Mass; Susan R Snyder; Paul Epner; James H Nichols; Julie A Gayken; Dennis Ernst; Edward B Liebow
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 2.  Current Methods of Haemolysis Detection and Reporting as a Source of Risk to Patient Safety: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Euan J McCaughey; Elia Vecellio; Rebecca Lake; Ling Li; Leslie Burnett; Douglas Chesher; Stephen Braye; Mark Mackay; Stephanie Gay; Tony C Badrick; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2016-12

3.  Intraarterial catheter diameter and dynamic response of arterial pressure monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hyongmin Oh; Suk Hyung Choe; Yoon Jung Kim; Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Hyung-Chul Lee; Hee-Pyoung Park
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.502

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.