Literature DB >> 12892682

Costing the cascade: estimating the cost of increased obstetric intervention in childbirth using population data.

Sally K Tracy1, Mark B Tracy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost of "the cascade" of obstetric interventions introduced during labour for low risk women.
DESIGN: A cost formula derived from population data.
SETTING: New South Wales, Australia. POPULATION: All 171,157 women having a live baby during 1996 and 1997.
METHODS: Four groups of interventions that occur during labour were identified. A cost model was constructed using the known age-adjusted rates for low risk women having one of three birth outcomes following these pre-specified interventions. Costs were based on statewide averages for the cost of labour and birth in hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure is an "average cost unit per woman" for low risk women, predicted by the level of intervention during labour. Obstetric care is classified as either private obstetric care in a private or public hospital, or routine public hospital care.
RESULTS: The relative cost of birth increased by up to 50% for low risk primiparous women and up to 36% for low risk multiparous women as labour interventions accumulated. An epidural was associated with a sharp increase in cost of up to 32% for some primiparous low risk women, and up to 36% for some multiparous low risk women. Private obstetric care increased the overall relative cost by 9% for primiparous low risk women and 4% for multiparous low risk women.
CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of a cascade of obstetric interventions during labour for low risk women is costly to the health system. Private obstetric care adds further to the cost of care for low risk women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12892682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  22 in total

1.  Labor Intervention and Outcomes in Women Who Are Nulliparous and Obese: Comparison of Nurse-Midwife to Obstetrician Intrapartum Care.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Elizabeth J Corwin; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Grecio Sandoval; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Robert M Silver; Gail Mallett; Kim Hill; Madeline Murguia Rice; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; John M Thorp; Suneet P Chauhan; Jay D Iams; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Ronald S Gibbs; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Home Birth Midwifery in the United States : Evolutionary Origins and Modern Challenges.

Authors:  Bria Dunham
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-12

4.  Modeling the distribution of Nursing Effort using structured Labor and Delivery documentation.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Mollie R Poynton; Scott P Narus; Sidney N Thornton
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: M@NGO (Midwives @ New Group practice Options).

Authors:  Sally K Tracy; Donna Hartz; Bev Hall; Jyai Allen; Amanda Forti; Anne Lainchbury; Jan White; Alec Welsh; Mark Tracy; Sue Kildea
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Sally K Tracy; Alec Welsh; Bev Hall; Donna Hartz; Anne Lainchbury; Andrew Bisits; Jan White; Mark B Tracy
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Rates of obstetric intervention and associated perinatal mortality and morbidity among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW (2000-2008): a linked data population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah G Dahlen; Sally Tracy; Mark Tracy; Andrew Bisits; Chris Brown; Charlene Thornton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study.

Authors:  Hannah Grace Dahlen; Sally Tracy; Mark Tracy; Andrew Bisits; Chris Brown; Charlene Thornton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Impact on caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nigel Lee; Lena B Mårtensson; Caroline Homer; Joan Webster; Kristen Gibbons; Helen Stapleton; Natalie Dos Santos; Michael Beckmann; Yu Gao; Sue Kildea
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet; María Pueyo; Herminia Biescas; Cristina Colls; Isabel Espiga; Joanna White; Xavi Espada; Josep Fusté; Vicente Ortún
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.