Literature DB >> 12890808

Outcome of women with inadequate cervical smears followed up for five years.

Y L Hock1, S Ramaiah, E S Wall, A M Harris, L Marston, J Marshall, K Kendall, A Teale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical and prognostic significance of "inadequate" cervical smear is unknown, even though women with repeated inadequate smears are referred for colposcopy in the National Health Service (NHS) Cervical Screening Programme. AIM: To follow up a cohort of women with inadequate cervical smears over the following five years to examine outcomes, including detection of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
METHODS: The study comprised 1972 women with an inadequate cervical smear reported at Walsall Hospitals NHS Trust between 1 April 1995 and 31 March 1996. Results of cervical smears and biopsies taken over the following five years were reviewed to confirm the outcome.
FINDINGS: Within five years, 2.2% of women with an inadequate cervical smear developed histologically confirmed high grade CIN, which was higher than the 1.3% seen among all women with cervical smear tests reported at the same laboratory over the same period, although the difference was not significant at the 95% level of confidence. Where inadequacy resulted from or was contributed to by "polymorphs obscuring", the risk of subsequent development/detection of high grade CIN was 2.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with inadequate cervical smears had an increased risk of detection of high grade CIN in the following five years compared with "all women". This increased risk was not significant, although if a larger number of women had been studied significance may have been reached, so that further studies are needed. The increased risk appeared to be at least partially dependent on the reason for inadequacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12890808      PMCID: PMC1770040          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.56.8.592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  8 in total

1.  Outcome of women referred to colposcopy for persistently inadequate smears.

Authors:  C Sen; M T Brett
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.073

2.  Cervical disease in women referred to colposcopy following inadequate smears.

Authors:  J Hollingworth; K Kotecha; S P Dobbs; P A Shaw; D Ireland
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.073

Review 3.  Personal view. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?

Authors:  A Herbert; J Johnson
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.073

4.  Influence of smear quality on the rate of detecting significant cervical cytologic abnormalities.

Authors:  J A Henry; V Wadehra
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

5.  The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.

Authors:  S L Williamson; T Hair; V Wadehra
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.073

6.  Interlaboratory reproducibility in reporting inadequate cervical smears--a multicentre multinational study.

Authors:  S Ciatto; M P Cariaggi; A P Minuti; M Confortini; D Palli; L Pas; G McKee; U Schenck; A Bonaccorsi; G Corradi; S Olivati; L Pieri; D Carretti; V Cocchi
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.073

7.  Accelerated decline in cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales.

Authors:  P Sasieni; J Cuzick; E Farmery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-12-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.

Authors:  A Herbert; J Johnson; J Patnick
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.073

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Female-to-male patients have high prevalence of unsatisfactory Paps compared to non-transgender females: implications for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Sarah M Peitzmeier; Sari L Reisner; Padmini Harigopal; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Clinical characteristics and a 2-year follow-up of unsatisfactory conventional Pap smears: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Chin-Tzu Tien; Pei-Chen Li; Chi-Jui Chen; Dah-Ching Ding
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results.

Authors:  D P French; E Maissi; T M Marteau
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.