Literature DB >> 12887981

Defective pantomime of object use in left brain damage: apraxia or asymbolia?

Georg Goldenberg1, Karoline Hartmann, Isa Schlott.   

Abstract

Disturbance of pantomime of object use in patients with left brain damage (LBD) and aphasia has been firmly established but its nature remains controversial. It may be due to an inability to perform movements from memory without external support by objects (apraxia) or to an inability to produce signs referring to absent objects and actions (asymbolia). The need to perform movements without external support is shared with imitation of gestures, and the demand to designate absent objects with drawing from memory. Both of these tasks have been found to be impaired in LBD. We examined pantomime of object use, drawing objects from memory, imitation of meaningless gestures, and aphasia in 40 patients with LBD and aphasia and compared them to healthy controls and to patients with right brain damage (RBD). Whereas drawing showed comparable sensitivity to LBD and RBD, pantomime was distinctly more disturbed in LBD than in RBD patients. Pantomime was worse than drawing in LBD but better than drawing in RBD. In the LBD group scores on pantomime showed significant correlations of very similar strength to drawing, imitation, and all language tests. Multidimensional scaling of the correlational structure placed pantomime in an intermediate position between verbal and non-verbal tests. We conclude that neither apraxia nor asymbolia can satisfactorily explain our results. It seems as if pantomime of object use taps a central aspect of left hemisphere function which is compromised by any LBD. We propose that this may be the ability to select and combine distinctive features of objects and actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12887981     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00120-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  33 in total

1.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills.

Authors:  Scott H Johnson-Frey; Roger Newman-Norlund; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  [Structural and functional neuroimaging of the pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  P H Weiss; G R Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  [Apraxias].

Authors:  F Binkofski; G Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Effect of learning on imitation of new actions: implications for a memory model.

Authors:  Alessia Tessari; Dasa Bosanac; Raffaella Ida Rumiati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Processing the spatial configuration of complex actions involves right posterior parietal cortex: An fMRI study with clinical implications.

Authors:  Peter H Weiss; Nuh N Rahbari; Silke Lux; Uwe Pietrzyk; Johannes Noth; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level.

Authors:  Gregory Króliczak; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Action semantics and movement characteristics engage distinct processing streams during the observation of tool use.

Authors:  Markus Hoeren; Christoph P Kaller; Volkmar Glauche; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Michel Rijntjes; Farsin Hamzei; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cerebral lateralization of praxis in right- and left-handedness: same pattern, different strength.

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Frederic Acke; Ann-Sofie Alderweireldt; Jo Nys; Pieter Vandemaele; Eric Achten
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The effect of aging and contextual information on manual asymmetry in tool use.

Authors:  Tea Lulic; Jacquelyn M Maciukiewicz; David A Gonzalez; Eric A Roy; Clark R Dickerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grip force is part of the semantic representation of manual action verbs.

Authors:  Victor Frak; Tatjana Nazir; Michel Goyette; Henri Cohen; Marc Jeannerod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.