PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility, tolerability, and toxicity of an intensified induction regimen (vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide [VIDE]) in patients with newly diagnosed Ewing's family of tumors (EFT); to assess ability to maintain dose-intensity, and predictability of peripheral-blood stem cell mobilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were treated with vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg) on day 1, doxorubicin 20 mg/m2, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 plus mesna and etoposide 150 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3. Cycles were given every 21 days for up to six cycles. RESULTS: One-hundred and seventy cycles of VIDE were given. The median treatment interval was 21 days (21 to 42) and nadir count: hemoglobin 8.3 (6.3 to 11.9), neutrophils 0.045 (0.0 to 2.1), and platelets 45 (3 to 343). There were 96 episodes of infection requiring hospitalization (56%). Growth factor support reduced infectious complications by 34%. Etoposide dose was reduced, or omitted, in 24% of cycles. Four patients did not complete six cycles due to unacceptable toxicity and one patient progressed on treatment. Twenty patients underwent peripheral-blood stem cell harvesting, 15 after cycle 3, and five after cycle 4. Median CD34+ yield was 4.6 x 106/kg per patient (1.8 to 14.5). Overall response to treatment, measured in 24 patients, was 88%. Seven of 11 patients undergoing surgery achieved greater than 90% necrosis of tumor (64%). CONCLUSION: VIDE is an effective induction regimen with substantial but acceptable toxicity that allows predictable mobilization of stem cells. Maintenance of dose-intensity is feasible in the majority of patients. Growth factors play a role in maintaining dose-intensity and reduce infectious complications.
PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility, tolerability, and toxicity of an intensified induction regimen (vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide [VIDE]) in patients with newly diagnosed Ewing's family of tumors (EFT); to assess ability to maintain dose-intensity, and predictability of peripheral-blood stem cell mobilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were treated with vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg) on day 1, doxorubicin 20 mg/m2, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 plus mesna and etoposide 150 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3. Cycles were given every 21 days for up to six cycles. RESULTS: One-hundred and seventy cycles of VIDE were given. The median treatment interval was 21 days (21 to 42) and nadir count: hemoglobin 8.3 (6.3 to 11.9), neutrophils 0.045 (0.0 to 2.1), and platelets 45 (3 to 343). There were 96 episodes of infection requiring hospitalization (56%). Growth factor support reduced infectious complications by 34%. Etoposide dose was reduced, or omitted, in 24% of cycles. Four patients did not complete six cycles due to unacceptable toxicity and one patient progressed on treatment. Twenty patients underwent peripheral-blood stem cell harvesting, 15 after cycle 3, and five after cycle 4. Median CD34+ yield was 4.6 x 106/kg per patient (1.8 to 14.5). Overall response to treatment, measured in 24 patients, was 88%. Seven of 11 patients undergoing surgery achieved greater than 90% necrosis of tumor (64%). CONCLUSION:VIDE is an effective induction regimen with substantial but acceptable toxicity that allows predictable mobilization of stem cells. Maintenance of dose-intensity is feasible in the majority of patients. Growth factors play a role in maintaining dose-intensity and reduce infectious complications.
Authors: Jeremy Whelan; Marie-Cecile Le Deley; Uta Dirksen; Gwénaël Le Teuff; Bernadette Brennan; Nathalie Gaspar; Douglas S Hawkins; Susanne Amler; Sebastian Bauer; Stefan Bielack; Jean-Yves Blay; Stefan Burdach; Marie-Pierre Castex; Dagmar Dilloo; Angelika Eggert; Hans Gelderblom; Jean-Claude Gentet; Wolfgang Hartmann; Wolf-Achim Hassenpflug; Lars Hjorth; Marta Jimenez; Thomas Klingebiel; Udo Kontny; Jarmila Kruseova; Ruth Ladenstein; Valerie Laurence; Cyril Lervat; Perrine Marec-Berard; Sandrine Marreaud; Jean Michon; Bruce Morland; Michael Paulussen; Andreas Ranft; Peter Reichardt; Hendrik van den Berg; Keith Wheatley; Ian Judson; Ian Lewis; Alan Craft; Heribert Juergens; Odile Oberlin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Denise Willmer; Stefan K Zöllner; Frieder Schaumburg; Heribert Jürgens; Thomas Lehrnbecher; Andreas H Groll Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Uta Dirksen; Bernadette Brennan; Marie-Cécile Le Deley; Nathalie Cozic; Henk van den Berg; Vivek Bhadri; Bénédicte Brichard; Line Claude; Alan Craft; Susanne Amler; Natalie Gaspar; Hans Gelderblom; Robert Goldsby; Richard Gorlick; Holcombe E Grier; Jean-Marc Guinbretiere; Peter Hauser; Lars Hjorth; Katherine Janeway; Heribert Juergens; Ian Judson; Mark Krailo; Jarmila Kruseova; Thomas Kuehne; Ruth Ladenstein; Cyril Lervat; Stephen L Lessnick; Ian Lewis; Claude Linassier; Perrine Marec-Berard; Neyssa Marina; Bruce Morland; Hélène Pacquement; Michael Paulussen; R Lor Randall; Andreas Ranft; Gwénaël Le Teuff; Keith Wheatley; Jeremy Whelan; Richard Womer; Odile Oberlin; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Uwe Thiel; Angela Wawer; Irene von Luettichau; Hans-Ulrich Bender; Franziska Blaeschke; Thomas G P Grunewald; Marc Steinborn; Barbara Röper; Halvard Bonig; Thomas Klingebiel; Peter Bader; Ewa Koscielniak; Michael Paulussen; Uta Dirksen; Heribert Juergens; Hans-Jochem Kolb; Stefan E G Burdach Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-10-25