Literature DB >> 12884065

Comparative evaluation of BDProbeTec ET, LCx and PACE 2 assays for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

C Pollara1, L Terlenghi, M A De Francesco, F Gargiulo, F Perandin, N Manca.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12884065     DOI： 10.1007/s10096-003-0967-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN： 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs.

Authors:  B Van Der Pol; D V Ferrero; L Buck-Barrington; E Hook; C Lenderman; T Quinn; C A Gaydos; J Lovchik; J Schachter; J Moncada; G Hall; M J Tuohy; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of sequential testing strategies using non-amplified and amplified methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women.

Authors:  Heather Semeniuk; Ali Zentner; Ron Read; Deirdre Church
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening.

Authors:  M Buimer; G J van Doornum; S Ching; P G Peerbooms; P K Plier; D Ram; H H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis and sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-15

Review 5.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Influence of endocervical specimen adequacy on PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  L E Welsh; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  An algorithm to detect Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction on specimens extracted for enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  L Chui; J Kakulphimp; B Detwiler; E Prasad
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard.

Authors:  Carolyn M Black; Jeanne Marrazzo; Robert E Johnson; Edward W Hook; Robert B Jones; Timothy A Green; Julius Schachter; Walter E Stamm; Gail Bolan; Michael E St Louis; David H Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics.

Authors:  D V Ferrero; H N Meyers; D E Schultz; S A Willis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis using cervical swabs, urine, and self-obtained vaginal swabs in a sexually transmitted disease clinic setting.

Authors:  Diane R Blake; Nancy Maldeis; Mathilda R Barnes; Andrew Hardick; Thomas C Quinn; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Measure of HIV/STD risk-reduction: strategies for enhancing the utility of behavioral and biological outcome measures for African American couples.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.731
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.