Literature DB >> 12883190

Use of steatotic graft in living-donor liver transplantation.

Yuji Soejima1, Mitsuo Shimada, Taketoshi Suehiro, Keiji Kishikawa, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Koji Hashimoto, Ryosuke Minagawa, Shoji Hiroshige, Takahiro Terashi, Mizuki Ninomiya, Satoko Shiotani, Noboru Harada, Keizo Sugimachi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The degree of fatty infiltration in hepatic grafts is known to be an important risk factor for primary graft nonfunction in cadaveric liver transplantation. However, the effect of hepatic steatosis in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not yet been well defined. In this study, we evaluated the impact that the degree of hepatic graft steatosis has on the outcome of LDLT.
METHODS: Sixty consecutive donors and recipients who underwent LDLT between October 1996 and August 2001 at Kyushu University Hospital were the subjects of this study. The pathologic findings of the prereperfusion biopsy of the graft were classified into the following three groups according to the degree of macrovesicular steatosis: None (n=23), 0% steatosis; Mild (n=23), 0% to 20% steatosis; and Moderate (n=6), 20% to 50% steatosis. Liver function tests including total bilirubin (at postoperative day [POD] 7), the peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and prothrombin time (at POD 3), and both patient and graft survival were compared among the groups. Furthermore, we also compared the donor parameters including the peak ALT and total bilirubin (at POD 3) and the operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay after surgery.
RESULTS: The 1-year patient and graft survival were comparable among the groups. The peak ALT was significantly higher in the Moderate group (606+/-641 IU/L) than in the None (290+/-190 IU/L) and Mild (376+/-296 IU/L) groups. Total bilirubin (POD 7) and prothrombin time (POD 3) were comparable among the groups. The donor parameters were comparable among the groups except for the fact that the donor body weight of the Mild and Moderate groups were significantly heavier (P<0.0001) than that of the None group.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the use of a fatty liver graft up to the moderate level can be justified in LDLT, even though ischemia-reperfusion injury tends to be severe in such grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12883190     DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000071205.52835.A4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  25 in total

1.  Frozen section diagnosis in donor liver biopsies: observer variation of semiquantitative and quantitative steatosis assessment.

Authors:  Stefan Biesterfeld; Jasmin Knapp; Fernando Bittinger; Heiko Götte; Martin Schramm; Gerd Otto
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Shehab M Abd El-Kader; Eman M Salah El-Den Ashmawy
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-28

Review 3.  Clinical review of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in liver surgery and transplantation.

Authors:  Amit D Tevar; Calissia Clarke; Jiang Wang; Steven M Rudich; E Steve Woodle; Alex B Lentsch; Michael L Edwards
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Pushing the frontiers of living donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Kim; Seung Duk Lee; Young Kyu Kim; Sang-Jae Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Donor age affects liver regeneration during early period in the graft liver and late period in the remnant liver after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Akihiro Tanemura; Shugo Mizuno; Hideo Wada; Tomomi Yamada; Tsutomu Nobori; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft.

Authors:  Masahiko Taniguchi; Tsuyoshi Shimamura; Satoru Todo; Hiroyuki Furukawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  The impact of diet-induced hepatic steatosis in a murine model of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Kim H H Liss; Kyle S McCommis; Kari T Chambers; Terri A Pietka; George G Schweitzer; Sara L Park; Ilke Nalbantoglu; Carla J Weinheimer; Angela M Hall; Brian N Finck
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 8.  Current concept of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Toru Ikegami; Mitsuo Shimada; Satoru Imura; Yusuke Arakawa; Akira Nii; Yuji Morine; Hirofumi Kanemura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Donor Hepatic Steatosis Induce Exacerbated Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Through Activation of Innate Immune Response Molecular Pathways.

Authors:  Ricardo C Gehrau; Valeria R Mas; Catherine I Dumur; Jihee L Suh; Ashish K Sharma; Helen P Cathro; Daniel G Maluf
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Oil Red O-assessed macrosteatosis in liver transplant donor biopsies predicts ischemia-reperfusion injury and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Henning Reis; Patricia T Peterek; Jeremias Wohlschlaeger; Gernot M Kaiser; Zoltan Mathe; Benjamin Juntermanns; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Ulrich Beckhove; Ali Canbay; Ulrike Wirges; Andre Scherag; Juergen-Walter Treckmann; Andreas Paul; Hideo Andreas Baba
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.