Literature DB >> 12883071

Continuing inequality: gender and social class influences on self perceived health after a heart attack.

E A Lacey1, S J Walters.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of social class and gender on self perceived health status for those recovering from an acute myocardial infarction.
DESIGN: A longitudinal survey design was used, collecting both qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative data are reported in this article, obtained by questionnaire over the first year after the event. SF-36 and EQ-5D (EuroQol) were used to measure self perceived health status.
SETTING: Community based study in a city in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 229 people discharged from hospital after acute myocardial infarction. MAIN
RESULTS: Overall gain in health status was found to be statistically significant over the year. Improvements were greatest in domains relating to role fulfillment and pursuit of normal and social activities. When analysed by gender, women showed poorer improvement than men, particularly in the domains relating to physical and social functioning. Analysed by social class, those without educational qualifications showed poorer improvement in pain experience and vitality. Access to a car was significant in avoiding physical limitations and promoting general health.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing gradients between the health of women and men, and between the social classes, are maintained and probably exacerbated by the experience of acute illness, and health professionals need to be made aware of social groups who are at risk of poor rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12883071      PMCID: PMC1732552          DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.8.622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  11 in total

1.  Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey.

Authors:  S J Walters; J F Munro; J E Brazier
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Barriers to uptake of services for coronary heart disease: qualitative study.

Authors:  A M Tod; C Read; A Lacey; J Abbott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-28

4.  Barriers to referral in patients with angina: qualitative study.

Authors:  K Gardner; A Chapple
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-14

5.  Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality.

Authors:  N Payne; C Saul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-25

6.  Class differences in the social consequences of illness?

Authors:  C Lindholm; B Burström; F Diderichsen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

Authors:  J E Brazier; R Harper; N M Jones; A O'Cathain; K J Thomas; T Usherwood; L Westlake
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-18

8.  Patients' perceptions of their heart attack and recovery: the influence of epidemiological "evidence" and personal experience.

Authors:  R Wiles
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Social inequalities in health: next questions and converging evidence.

Authors:  M Marmot; C D Ryff; L L Bumpass; M Shipley; N F Marks
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence.

Authors:  M G Marmot; H Bosma; H Hemingway; E Brunner; S Stansfeld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population.

Authors:  Erica I Lubetkin; Haomiao Jia; Peter Franks; Marthe R Gold
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Is primary angioplasty cost effective in the UK? Results of a comprehensive decision analysis.

Authors:  Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Stephen Palmer; Christian Asseburg; Elisabeth Fenwick; Mark de Belder; Keith Abrams; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  The effects of barriers on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) and compliance in adult asthmatics who are followed in an urban community health care facility.

Authors:  Rosemary L Hoffmann; Wesley M Rohrer; Jeannette E South-Paul; Ray Burdett; Valerie J M Watzlaf
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-12

5.  Evaluation of health-related quality of life using EQ-5D in Takamatsu, Japan.

Authors:  Ai Fujikawa; Takeshi Suzue; Fumihiko Jitsunari; Tomohiro Hirao
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 6.  Bivalirudin for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a NICE single technology appraisal.

Authors:  E L Simpson; P Fitzgerald; P Evans; P Tappenden; N Kalita; J P D Reckless; A Bakhai
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Sex differences in vascular reactivity of coronary artery bypass graft conduits.

Authors:  Amenah Jaghoori; Victor Lamin; Rachel Jacobczak; Michael Worthington; James Edwards; Fabiano Viana; Robert Stuklis; David P Wilson; John F Beltrame
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Physical function and independence 1 year after myocardial infarction: observations from the Translational Research Investigating Underlying disparities in recovery from acute Myocardial infarction: Patients' Health status registry.

Authors:  John A Dodson; Suzanne V Arnold; Kimberly J Reid; Thomas M Gill; Michael W Rich; Frederick A Masoudi; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz; Karen P Alexander
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Gender differences in the trajectory of recovery in health status among young patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the variation in recovery: role of gender on outcomes of young AMI patients (VIRGO) study.

Authors:  Rachel P Dreyer; Yongfei Wang; Kelly M Strait; Nancy P Lorenze; Gail D'Onofrio; Héctor Bueno; Judith H Lichtman; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care.

Authors:  Alexander M Clark; Marie DesMeules; Wei Luo; Amanda S Duncan; Andy Wielgosz
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.