Literature DB >> 12880459

Patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Anne J Lee1, Jie Jin Wang, Elena Rochtchina, Paul Healey, Ee-Munn Chia, Paul Mitchell.   

Abstract

This report aims to describe the frequency of different patterns of visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). The Blue Mountains Eye Study examined 3654 persons (aged 49+) during 1992-1994. Humphrey supra-threshold visual fields were performed in 88.9%. Those classified as glaucoma suspects had 30-2 full-threshold fields (9.2%). Of OAG cases (n = 108) with field tests in both eyes (n = 97), unilateral defects were present in 49 (50.5%) and bilateral in 48 (49.5%). Advanced field loss was found in 16 (15.4%) subjects and in 22 (10.9%) eyes, with bilateral loss present in 6 (6.2%) cases. Of all eyes of OAG cases (n = 201), 49 (24.4%) had no defects, 52 (25.9%) upper, 61 (30.3%) lower, and 17 (8.5%) had combined upper and lower loss. Of the upper and lower cases (n = 113), the types of defects included nasal step (36), arcuate (26), nasal plus arcuate (26), and hemispherical defects (25). Of subjects with fields in at least one eye (n = 104), there was a similar proportion in the worse eye of upper defects (28.8%), lower (31.7%), and combined upper and lower (24.0%). Undiagnosed OAG was more frequent in unilateral (65.3%) than bilateral (34.7%) cases (P = 0.003). This study reports the pattern of typical glaucomatous field loss in an older Australian population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12880459     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00660.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  10 in total

1.  Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Bettina Selig; Elke Krapp; Jens Paetzold
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Imaging Glaucomatous Damage Across the Temporal Raphe.

Authors:  Gang Huang; Ting Luo; Thomas J Gast; Stephen A Burns; Victor E Malinovsky; William H Swanson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  In vivo adaptive optics imaging of the temporal raphe and its relationship to the optic disc and fovea in the human retina.

Authors:  Gang Huang; Thomas J Gast; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Peripapillary and Macular Vessel Density in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Unilateral Visual Field Loss.

Authors:  Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Linda M Zangwill; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Nathanael J Fuller; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Luke J Saunders; Min Hee Suh; Kyle Hasenstab; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Prevalence and spatial concordance of visual field deterioration in fellow eyes of glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Min Kyo Kim; Jun Mo Lee; Esteban Morales; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-19

6.  Incidence of glaucomatous visual field loss after two decades of follow-up: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Henriët Springelkamp; Roger C Wolfs; Wishal D Ramdas; Albert Hofman; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C Klaver; Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Intereye structure-function relationship using photopic negative response in patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect.

Authors:  Jihye Lee; Seong Ah Kim; Jiyun Lee; Chan Kee Park; Kyoung In Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Association of Intereye Visual-Sensitivity Asymmetry With Progression of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Eunoo Bak; Young Kook Kim; Ahnul Ha; Young Soo Han; Jin-Soo Kim; Jinho Lee; Yong Woo Kim; Sung Uk Baek; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Pupillary anomaly masquerading as a glaucomatous visual field defect: a case report.

Authors:  Niall Patton; Adrian Tey
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; Jonathan S Myers; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.