Literature DB >> 12880287

Modulation of nonspecific binding in ultrafiltration protein binding studies.

Kyoung-Jin Lee1, Rachel Mower, Tom Hollenbeck, Jesus Castelo, Nikole Johnson, Perry Gordon, Patrick J Sinko, Kevin Holme, Yong-Hee Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to reduce or prevent nonspecific binding (NSB) of compounds to ultrafiltration (UF) protein binding (PB) testing units.
METHODS: UF units (regenerated cellulose, MWCO 10K) were used for PB and NSB measurements with or without pretreatment with 5% tween 80 (TW 80) or 5% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on the filter membrane. Dosing solutions (10 microM) in human serum and pH 7.4 phosphate-buffered saline were centrifuged at 3,000 g and room temperature after 1-h incubation in UF testing units. In parallel, a 96-well equilibrium dialyzer was used for PB and NSB measurements in equilibrium dialysis (ED) at 37 degrees C for 4 h. Samples of UF and ED were analyzed by LC/MS or LSC.
RESULTS: Severe NSB was observed for etoposide, hydrocortisone, propranolol, and vinblastine in UF. In contrast, TW 80 or BAK pre-treatment on the filter membrane decreased the NSB from 87-95% to 13-64% without causing a significant change in membrane integrity. When NSB was below 50% as a result of pretreating agents, PB data of marker compounds were comparable to those of ED.
CONCLUSIONS: The pretreated membrane with TW 80 or BAK showed significantly less NSB for compounds that had a tendency toward high membrane binding. A modified UF method with pretreatment improved the performance of UF and was able to produce comparable PB results to ED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12880287     DOI: 10.1023/a:1024406221962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  22 in total

Review 1.  Methods of drug protein binding determinations.

Authors:  B Sebille
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.748

Review 2.  High-performance frontal analysis for drug-protein binding study.

Authors:  A Shibukawa; Y Kuroda; T Nakagawa
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.935

3.  Determination of the Donnan effect in equilibrium dialysis and a simple method for its correction.

Authors:  P Suter; J P Rosenbusch
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Evaluation of a rapid ultrafiltration technique for determination of quinidine protein binding and comparison with equilibrium dialysis.

Authors:  H R Ha; S Vozeh; F Follath
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 5.  Free drug measurements: methodology and clinical significance.

Authors:  T C Kwong
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1985-10-15       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Evaluation of methods to determine protein-binding of drugs. Equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration, ultracentrifugation, gel filtration.

Authors:  H Kurz; H Trunk; B Weitz
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1977-07

7.  Factors affecting the binding of disopyramide to serum proteins.

Authors:  L M Shaw; R Altman; B C Thompson; L Fields
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Factors affecting ultrafiltration-assessed values for drug binding.

Authors:  R A Tasker; K Nakatsu
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  The "ultra-free" ultrafiltration technique compared with equilibrium dialysis for determination of unbound thiopental concentrations in serum.

Authors:  D Jung; M Mayersohn; D Perrier
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  [Binding of sulfonamides to protein. 6. Determination of protein binding of sulfonamides by means of ultracentrifuge and gel filtration].

Authors:  W Scholtan
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1965-12
View more
  19 in total

1.  Characterization of the Preclinical Pharmacology of the New 2-Aminomethylphenol, JPC-3210, for Malaria Treatment and Prevention.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Birrell; Gavin D Heffernan; Guy A Schiehser; John Anderson; Arba L Ager; Pablo Morales; Donna MacKenzie; Karin van Breda; Marina Chavchich; Laura R Jacobus; G Dennis Shanks; David P Jacobus; Michael D Edstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Protein Binding of First-Line Antituberculosis Drugs.

Authors:  Wael A Alghamdi; Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Charles A Peloquin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Intestinal absorption of novel-dipeptide prodrugs of saquinavir in rats.

Authors:  Ritesh Jain; Sridhar Duvvuri; Viral Kansara; Nanda Kishore Mandava; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2006-12-03       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Interpreting physicochemical experimental data sets.

Authors:  Nicola Colclough; Mark C Wenlock
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the anticancer prodrug simmitecan in different experimental animals.

Authors:  Zhe-yi Hu; Xiu-xue Li; Fei-fei Du; Jun-ling Yang; Wei Niu; Fang Xu; Feng-qing Wang; Chuan Li; Yan Sun
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Towards "CO in a pill": Pharmacokinetic studies of carbon monoxide prodrugs in mice.

Authors:  Minjia Wang; Xiaoxiao Yang; Zhixiang Pan; Yingzhe Wang; Ladie Kimberly De La Cruz; Binghe Wang; Chalet Tan
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  A mass balance approach for calculation of recovery and binding enables the use of ultrafiltration as a rapid method for measurement of plasma protein binding for even highly lipophilic compounds.

Authors:  Changguang Wang; Noelle S Williams
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.935

8.  Effects of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury on the P-glycoprotein activity at the liver canalicular membrane and blood-brain barrier determined by in vivo administration of rhodamine 123 in rats.

Authors:  Mohammad K Miah; Imam H Shaik; Ulrich Bickel; Reza Mehvar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  A graphical method to compare the in vivo binding potential of PET radioligands in the absence of a reference region: application to [¹¹C]PBR28 and [¹⁸F]PBR111 for TSPO imaging.

Authors:  Qi Guo; David R Owen; Eugenii A Rabiner; Federico E Turkheimer; Roger N Gunn
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Limited sampling pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous ondansetron in healthy geriatric cats, cats with chronic kidney disease, and cats with liver disease.

Authors:  R L Fitzpatrick; L A Wittenburg; R J Hansen; D L Gustafson; J M Quimby
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.786

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.